The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

192 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While research has identified a variety of hybrid governance structures, it has described and sought to explain this variety from different theoretical perspectives that are not readily reconcilable. This limits our ability systematically to compare different types of hybrids and on this basis to further theoretical understanding. Results of an empirical survey of transactions in buyer–supplier relations in the German construction industry provide novel insights into three distinct, widely employed types of hybrid governance structures. The study systematically compares the found hybrid governance structures and explores their rationales. As its main theoretical contribution, this study offers an empirically based typology of hybrid governance structures that complements earlier theorizing. It suggests that embeddedness and transaction cost arguments complement one another in explaining different and previously theoretically unspecified types of hybrid governance structures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1491 - 1529
JournalJournal of Management
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Governance structure
Empirical survey
Rationale
Transaction costs
Construction industry
Embeddedness
Theorizing

Cite this

@article{5e822498ac994174bd9188358772b529,
title = "The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy",
abstract = "While research has identified a variety of hybrid governance structures, it has described and sought to explain this variety from different theoretical perspectives that are not readily reconcilable. This limits our ability systematically to compare different types of hybrids and on this basis to further theoretical understanding. Results of an empirical survey of transactions in buyer–supplier relations in the German construction industry provide novel insights into three distinct, widely employed types of hybrid governance structures. The study systematically compares the found hybrid governance structures and explores their rationales. As its main theoretical contribution, this study offers an empirically based typology of hybrid governance structures that complements earlier theorizing. It suggests that embeddedness and transaction cost arguments complement one another in explaining different and previously theoretically unspecified types of hybrid governance structures.",
author = "M. Ebers and L.A.G. Oerlemans",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1177/0149206313506938",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1491 -- 1529",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy. / Ebers, M.; Oerlemans, L.A.G.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 42, No. 6, 26.07.2016, p. 1491 - 1529.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy

AU - Ebers, M.

AU - Oerlemans, L.A.G.

PY - 2016/7/26

Y1 - 2016/7/26

N2 - While research has identified a variety of hybrid governance structures, it has described and sought to explain this variety from different theoretical perspectives that are not readily reconcilable. This limits our ability systematically to compare different types of hybrids and on this basis to further theoretical understanding. Results of an empirical survey of transactions in buyer–supplier relations in the German construction industry provide novel insights into three distinct, widely employed types of hybrid governance structures. The study systematically compares the found hybrid governance structures and explores their rationales. As its main theoretical contribution, this study offers an empirically based typology of hybrid governance structures that complements earlier theorizing. It suggests that embeddedness and transaction cost arguments complement one another in explaining different and previously theoretically unspecified types of hybrid governance structures.

AB - While research has identified a variety of hybrid governance structures, it has described and sought to explain this variety from different theoretical perspectives that are not readily reconcilable. This limits our ability systematically to compare different types of hybrids and on this basis to further theoretical understanding. Results of an empirical survey of transactions in buyer–supplier relations in the German construction industry provide novel insights into three distinct, widely employed types of hybrid governance structures. The study systematically compares the found hybrid governance structures and explores their rationales. As its main theoretical contribution, this study offers an empirically based typology of hybrid governance structures that complements earlier theorizing. It suggests that embeddedness and transaction cost arguments complement one another in explaining different and previously theoretically unspecified types of hybrid governance structures.

U2 - 10.1177/0149206313506938

DO - 10.1177/0149206313506938

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1491

EP - 1529

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 6

ER -