The weakest link in welfare state legitimacy: European perceptions of moral and administrative failure in the targeting of social benefits

F. Roosma, W.J.H. van Oorschot, J.P.T.M. Gelissen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the field of welfare attitude research, generally studies examining critical attitudes toward the welfare state are rather limited. However, the existing studies find that people are most negative about the mis-targeting of welfare benefits – that is, people are particularly critical of the high overuse (misuse or fraud) and high underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. This study contributes to the current literature by more extensively analyzing perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare benefits by revealing the underlying perceptions of moral failure or failed administrative implementation. We also assess how different individual- and contextual-level factors influence those perceptions. We use data from the European Social Survey 2008/2009 for 25 European countries. We find that instead of representing two manifestations of the same concept of mis-targeting, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of benefits appear to be driven by normative ideas and opinions about the administrative effectiveness of the welfare state. Whereas normative ideas about the overuse of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s political ideology and the selectivity of the redistribution system, ideas about the effectiveness of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s institutional trust, the quality of the welfare state and the economic context. We conclude that critical attitudes toward the welfare state have multiple dimensions and can be both substantive and procedural in nature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to) 489-508
JournalInternational Journal of Comparative Sociology
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

social benefits
welfare state
legitimacy
welfare
attitude research
ESS
political ideology
fraud
redistribution
economics

Cite this

@article{bbdd48d3a8a14afd8520890a7506a800,
title = "The weakest link in welfare state legitimacy: European perceptions of moral and administrative failure in the targeting of social benefits",
abstract = "In the field of welfare attitude research, generally studies examining critical attitudes toward the welfare state are rather limited. However, the existing studies find that people are most negative about the mis-targeting of welfare benefits – that is, people are particularly critical of the high overuse (misuse or fraud) and high underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. This study contributes to the current literature by more extensively analyzing perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare benefits by revealing the underlying perceptions of moral failure or failed administrative implementation. We also assess how different individual- and contextual-level factors influence those perceptions. We use data from the European Social Survey 2008/2009 for 25 European countries. We find that instead of representing two manifestations of the same concept of mis-targeting, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of benefits appear to be driven by normative ideas and opinions about the administrative effectiveness of the welfare state. Whereas normative ideas about the overuse of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s political ideology and the selectivity of the redistribution system, ideas about the effectiveness of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s institutional trust, the quality of the welfare state and the economic context. We conclude that critical attitudes toward the welfare state have multiple dimensions and can be both substantive and procedural in nature.",
author = "F. Roosma and {van Oorschot}, W.J.H. and J.P.T.M. Gelissen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0020715214565932",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "489--508",
journal = "International Journal of Comparative Sociology",
issn = "0020-7152",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

The weakest link in welfare state legitimacy : European perceptions of moral and administrative failure in the targeting of social benefits. / Roosma, F.; van Oorschot, W.J.H.; Gelissen, J.P.T.M.

In: International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 55, No. 6, 2014, p. 489-508 .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The weakest link in welfare state legitimacy

T2 - European perceptions of moral and administrative failure in the targeting of social benefits

AU - Roosma, F.

AU - van Oorschot, W.J.H.

AU - Gelissen, J.P.T.M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In the field of welfare attitude research, generally studies examining critical attitudes toward the welfare state are rather limited. However, the existing studies find that people are most negative about the mis-targeting of welfare benefits – that is, people are particularly critical of the high overuse (misuse or fraud) and high underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. This study contributes to the current literature by more extensively analyzing perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare benefits by revealing the underlying perceptions of moral failure or failed administrative implementation. We also assess how different individual- and contextual-level factors influence those perceptions. We use data from the European Social Survey 2008/2009 for 25 European countries. We find that instead of representing two manifestations of the same concept of mis-targeting, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of benefits appear to be driven by normative ideas and opinions about the administrative effectiveness of the welfare state. Whereas normative ideas about the overuse of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s political ideology and the selectivity of the redistribution system, ideas about the effectiveness of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s institutional trust, the quality of the welfare state and the economic context. We conclude that critical attitudes toward the welfare state have multiple dimensions and can be both substantive and procedural in nature.

AB - In the field of welfare attitude research, generally studies examining critical attitudes toward the welfare state are rather limited. However, the existing studies find that people are most negative about the mis-targeting of welfare benefits – that is, people are particularly critical of the high overuse (misuse or fraud) and high underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. This study contributes to the current literature by more extensively analyzing perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare benefits by revealing the underlying perceptions of moral failure or failed administrative implementation. We also assess how different individual- and contextual-level factors influence those perceptions. We use data from the European Social Survey 2008/2009 for 25 European countries. We find that instead of representing two manifestations of the same concept of mis-targeting, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of benefits appear to be driven by normative ideas and opinions about the administrative effectiveness of the welfare state. Whereas normative ideas about the overuse of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s political ideology and the selectivity of the redistribution system, ideas about the effectiveness of benefits are mainly influenced by people’s institutional trust, the quality of the welfare state and the economic context. We conclude that critical attitudes toward the welfare state have multiple dimensions and can be both substantive and procedural in nature.

U2 - 10.1177/0020715214565932

DO - 10.1177/0020715214565932

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 489

EP - 508

JO - International Journal of Comparative Sociology

JF - International Journal of Comparative Sociology

SN - 0020-7152

IS - 6

ER -