Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: The second decade

Giovanni Sartor, Michal Araszkiewicz, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Tom van Engers, Enrico Francesconi, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sileno, Frank Schilder, Adam Wyner, Trevor Bench-Capon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first issue of Artificial Intelligence and Law journal was published in 1992. This paper provides commentaries on nine significant papers drawn from the Journal's second decade. Four of the papers relate to reasoning with legal cases, introducing contextual considerations, predicting outcomes on the basis of natural language descriptions of the cases, comparing different ways of representing cases, and formalising precedential reasoning. One introduces a method of analysing arguments that was to become very widely used in AI and Law, namely argumentation schemes. Two relate to ontologies for the representation of legal concepts and two take advantage of the increasing availability of legal corpora in this decade, to automate document summarisation and for the mining of arguments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)521-557
Number of pages37
JournalArtificial Intelligence and Law: An International Journal
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Reasoning with cases
  • Argumentation
  • Ontologies
  • Document summarisation
  • ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES
  • CRITICAL QUESTIONS
  • LEGAL
  • FRAMEWORK
  • MODEL
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • STORIES
  • LESSONS
  • HAYASHI
  • VALUES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: The second decade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this