Three-Fold Personalism: Ricoeur as a Personalist Après-la-Lettre

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The (continued) success of personalist philosophy in moral theology and politics is in stark contrast with the response within the field of philosophy itself. After a period of intense flowering between 1930-1950, a deafening silence soon descended. In this article, I will use Paul Ricoeur to guide me in my search for a form in which this type of thought can still be useful in philosophy today, a form that will lead to a greater recognition of the political as a unique factor than before. During his early years, Ricoeur had close ties to personalism, but as time moved on, he became more and more critical. A fact that is usually ignored however, is that the later Ricoeur seems to have tried to translate the personalist approach into a rather more efficient form within the context of contemporary philosophy. In this article, I will try to show that Ricoeur’s late, but important work Soi-même comme un autre (1990) should be regarded as the result of this attempt. Firstly, his ‘small ethics’ is very close to the personalist ethics of solidarity. Ricoeur’s reflections on the ethical pursuit of the good life with and for others in just institutions, offer a philosophical elaboration of the correction of personalism he wrote over thirty years earlier with regard to moral theology, using the same distinction between neighbour and fellow human being. Thus, he combined personalist intuitions with a greater recognition of the uniqueness of the political sphere in which we are connected to each other anonymously. Secondly, his hermeneutical phenomenology offers a solid anthropological base for those ethics, by connecting the three-foldedness of ethical aspiration with the implications of the analysis of language, action and narrativity in contemporary philosophy. I would suggest we interpret Ricoeur’s philosophy as a personalism après-la-lettre, not just because he elaborates on personalism in a way that is better able to resist the hostile context of contemporary philosophy, but mainly also because he succeeds better in integrating the uniqueness of the political sphere and of the personal political responsibility of citizens than the original French personalist did. Ricoeur’s three-fold personalism – the personalism of the person in relation to the first, the second and the third person – offers some outlines for a contemporary personalist philosophy.
    Translated title of the contributionThree-Fold Personalism: Ricoeur as a Personalist Après-la-Lettre
    Original languageDutch
    Pages (from-to)152-168
    JournalTijdschrift voor Theologie
    Volume57
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Fold
    Personalism
    Contemporary philosophy
    Philosophy
    Moral Theology
    Uniqueness
    Person
    Neighbors
    Narrativity
    Responsibility
    Thought
    Pursuit
    Paul Ricœur
    Human Being
    Solidarity
    Good Life
    Elaboration
    Intuition
    Language
    Phenomenology

    Cite this

    @article{8301d8a78d5b48eb84c077718a605cc0,
    title = "Drieledig personalisme: Ricoeur als personalist apr{\`e}s-la-lettre",
    abstract = "The (continued) success of personalist philosophy in moral theology and politics is in stark contrast with the response within the field of philosophy itself. After a period of intense flowering between 1930-1950, a deafening silence soon descended. In this article, I will use Paul Ricoeur to guide me in my search for a form in which this type of thought can still be useful in philosophy today, a form that will lead to a greater recognition of the political as a unique factor than before. During his early years, Ricoeur had close ties to personalism, but as time moved on, he became more and more critical. A fact that is usually ignored however, is that the later Ricoeur seems to have tried to translate the personalist approach into a rather more efficient form within the context of contemporary philosophy. In this article, I will try to show that Ricoeur’s late, but important work Soi-m{\^e}me comme un autre (1990) should be regarded as the result of this attempt. Firstly, his ‘small ethics’ is very close to the personalist ethics of solidarity. Ricoeur’s reflections on the ethical pursuit of the good life with and for others in just institutions, offer a philosophical elaboration of the correction of personalism he wrote over thirty years earlier with regard to moral theology, using the same distinction between neighbour and fellow human being. Thus, he combined personalist intuitions with a greater recognition of the uniqueness of the political sphere in which we are connected to each other anonymously. Secondly, his hermeneutical phenomenology offers a solid anthropological base for those ethics, by connecting the three-foldedness of ethical aspiration with the implications of the analysis of language, action and narrativity in contemporary philosophy. I would suggest we interpret Ricoeur’s philosophy as a personalism apr{\`e}s-la-lettre, not just because he elaborates on personalism in a way that is better able to resist the hostile context of contemporary philosophy, but mainly also because he succeeds better in integrating the uniqueness of the political sphere and of the personal political responsibility of citizens than the original French personalist did. Ricoeur’s three-fold personalism – the personalism of the person in relation to the first, the second and the third person – offers some outlines for a contemporary personalist philosophy.",
    author = "Dries Deweer",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.2143/TVT.57.2.3217946",
    language = "Dutch",
    volume = "57",
    pages = "152--168",
    journal = "Tijdschrift voor Theologie",
    issn = "0168-9959",
    publisher = "Boom Tijdschriften",
    number = "2",

    }

    Drieledig personalisme : Ricoeur als personalist après-la-lettre. / Deweer, Dries.

    In: Tijdschrift voor Theologie, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2017, p. 152-168.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Drieledig personalisme

    T2 - Ricoeur als personalist après-la-lettre

    AU - Deweer, Dries

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - The (continued) success of personalist philosophy in moral theology and politics is in stark contrast with the response within the field of philosophy itself. After a period of intense flowering between 1930-1950, a deafening silence soon descended. In this article, I will use Paul Ricoeur to guide me in my search for a form in which this type of thought can still be useful in philosophy today, a form that will lead to a greater recognition of the political as a unique factor than before. During his early years, Ricoeur had close ties to personalism, but as time moved on, he became more and more critical. A fact that is usually ignored however, is that the later Ricoeur seems to have tried to translate the personalist approach into a rather more efficient form within the context of contemporary philosophy. In this article, I will try to show that Ricoeur’s late, but important work Soi-même comme un autre (1990) should be regarded as the result of this attempt. Firstly, his ‘small ethics’ is very close to the personalist ethics of solidarity. Ricoeur’s reflections on the ethical pursuit of the good life with and for others in just institutions, offer a philosophical elaboration of the correction of personalism he wrote over thirty years earlier with regard to moral theology, using the same distinction between neighbour and fellow human being. Thus, he combined personalist intuitions with a greater recognition of the uniqueness of the political sphere in which we are connected to each other anonymously. Secondly, his hermeneutical phenomenology offers a solid anthropological base for those ethics, by connecting the three-foldedness of ethical aspiration with the implications of the analysis of language, action and narrativity in contemporary philosophy. I would suggest we interpret Ricoeur’s philosophy as a personalism après-la-lettre, not just because he elaborates on personalism in a way that is better able to resist the hostile context of contemporary philosophy, but mainly also because he succeeds better in integrating the uniqueness of the political sphere and of the personal political responsibility of citizens than the original French personalist did. Ricoeur’s three-fold personalism – the personalism of the person in relation to the first, the second and the third person – offers some outlines for a contemporary personalist philosophy.

    AB - The (continued) success of personalist philosophy in moral theology and politics is in stark contrast with the response within the field of philosophy itself. After a period of intense flowering between 1930-1950, a deafening silence soon descended. In this article, I will use Paul Ricoeur to guide me in my search for a form in which this type of thought can still be useful in philosophy today, a form that will lead to a greater recognition of the political as a unique factor than before. During his early years, Ricoeur had close ties to personalism, but as time moved on, he became more and more critical. A fact that is usually ignored however, is that the later Ricoeur seems to have tried to translate the personalist approach into a rather more efficient form within the context of contemporary philosophy. In this article, I will try to show that Ricoeur’s late, but important work Soi-même comme un autre (1990) should be regarded as the result of this attempt. Firstly, his ‘small ethics’ is very close to the personalist ethics of solidarity. Ricoeur’s reflections on the ethical pursuit of the good life with and for others in just institutions, offer a philosophical elaboration of the correction of personalism he wrote over thirty years earlier with regard to moral theology, using the same distinction between neighbour and fellow human being. Thus, he combined personalist intuitions with a greater recognition of the uniqueness of the political sphere in which we are connected to each other anonymously. Secondly, his hermeneutical phenomenology offers a solid anthropological base for those ethics, by connecting the three-foldedness of ethical aspiration with the implications of the analysis of language, action and narrativity in contemporary philosophy. I would suggest we interpret Ricoeur’s philosophy as a personalism après-la-lettre, not just because he elaborates on personalism in a way that is better able to resist the hostile context of contemporary philosophy, but mainly also because he succeeds better in integrating the uniqueness of the political sphere and of the personal political responsibility of citizens than the original French personalist did. Ricoeur’s three-fold personalism – the personalism of the person in relation to the first, the second and the third person – offers some outlines for a contemporary personalist philosophy.

    U2 - 10.2143/TVT.57.2.3217946

    DO - 10.2143/TVT.57.2.3217946

    M3 - Article

    VL - 57

    SP - 152

    EP - 168

    JO - Tijdschrift voor Theologie

    JF - Tijdschrift voor Theologie

    SN - 0168-9959

    IS - 2

    ER -