Time to move on or taking more time: How disregarding multiple perspectives on time can increase policy-making conflict

Eva Wolf, Wouter Van Dooren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article argues that when different perspectives on time remain disregarded in a public policy debate, policy-making conflict can increase. We present an in-depth qualitative analysis of media articles from 2005, 2009, and 2014 in the debate surrounding the contested ‘Oosterweel connection,’ a multibillion-euro infrastructure project in Antwerp (Belgium). Although concerns of time management motivated arguments to speed up the policy-process, the insensitivity of policy-makers to multiple perspectives on time increased conflict. Firstly, while administrative actors reasoned mainly from a procedural time perspective and saw time as scarce, citizens reasoned mostly from an impact-based time perspective and saw time as abundant. A binary debate on policy-making tempo (high versus low) ensued. Secondly, political actors often reasoned from political perspectives on time. Their actions, which were intended to appease, did not end the binary debate and sometimes reinforced it. As the debate on the Oosterweel connection persisted, parties increasingly believed that not only were their infrastructure goals incompatible, but so too were their goals for time management. This increased conflict.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-356
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironment and Planning C
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

policy making
time management
infrastructure
political actor
Euro
conflict
time
Belgium
qualitative analysis
public policy
citizen

Keywords

  • urban planning
  • policy making
  • time
  • time horizon
  • governance
  • public administration
  • Conflict management
  • Belgium
  • frames
  • sensemaking

Cite this

@article{b1802735aad94b188885ca54806913ae,
title = "Time to move on or taking more time: How disregarding multiple perspectives on time can increase policy-making conflict",
abstract = "This article argues that when different perspectives on time remain disregarded in a public policy debate, policy-making conflict can increase. We present an in-depth qualitative analysis of media articles from 2005, 2009, and 2014 in the debate surrounding the contested ‘Oosterweel connection,’ a multibillion-euro infrastructure project in Antwerp (Belgium). Although concerns of time management motivated arguments to speed up the policy-process, the insensitivity of policy-makers to multiple perspectives on time increased conflict. Firstly, while administrative actors reasoned mainly from a procedural time perspective and saw time as scarce, citizens reasoned mostly from an impact-based time perspective and saw time as abundant. A binary debate on policy-making tempo (high versus low) ensued. Secondly, political actors often reasoned from political perspectives on time. Their actions, which were intended to appease, did not end the binary debate and sometimes reinforced it. As the debate on the Oosterweel connection persisted, parties increasingly believed that not only were their infrastructure goals incompatible, but so too were their goals for time management. This increased conflict.",
keywords = "urban planning, policy making, time, time horizon, governance, public administration, Conflict management, Belgium, frames, sensemaking",
author = "Eva Wolf and {Van Dooren}, Wouter",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2399654417712243",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "340--356",
journal = "Environment and Planning C",
issn = "2399-6544",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Time to move on or taking more time : How disregarding multiple perspectives on time can increase policy-making conflict. / Wolf, Eva; Van Dooren, Wouter.

In: Environment and Planning C, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 340-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to move on or taking more time

T2 - How disregarding multiple perspectives on time can increase policy-making conflict

AU - Wolf, Eva

AU - Van Dooren, Wouter

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This article argues that when different perspectives on time remain disregarded in a public policy debate, policy-making conflict can increase. We present an in-depth qualitative analysis of media articles from 2005, 2009, and 2014 in the debate surrounding the contested ‘Oosterweel connection,’ a multibillion-euro infrastructure project in Antwerp (Belgium). Although concerns of time management motivated arguments to speed up the policy-process, the insensitivity of policy-makers to multiple perspectives on time increased conflict. Firstly, while administrative actors reasoned mainly from a procedural time perspective and saw time as scarce, citizens reasoned mostly from an impact-based time perspective and saw time as abundant. A binary debate on policy-making tempo (high versus low) ensued. Secondly, political actors often reasoned from political perspectives on time. Their actions, which were intended to appease, did not end the binary debate and sometimes reinforced it. As the debate on the Oosterweel connection persisted, parties increasingly believed that not only were their infrastructure goals incompatible, but so too were their goals for time management. This increased conflict.

AB - This article argues that when different perspectives on time remain disregarded in a public policy debate, policy-making conflict can increase. We present an in-depth qualitative analysis of media articles from 2005, 2009, and 2014 in the debate surrounding the contested ‘Oosterweel connection,’ a multibillion-euro infrastructure project in Antwerp (Belgium). Although concerns of time management motivated arguments to speed up the policy-process, the insensitivity of policy-makers to multiple perspectives on time increased conflict. Firstly, while administrative actors reasoned mainly from a procedural time perspective and saw time as scarce, citizens reasoned mostly from an impact-based time perspective and saw time as abundant. A binary debate on policy-making tempo (high versus low) ensued. Secondly, political actors often reasoned from political perspectives on time. Their actions, which were intended to appease, did not end the binary debate and sometimes reinforced it. As the debate on the Oosterweel connection persisted, parties increasingly believed that not only were their infrastructure goals incompatible, but so too were their goals for time management. This increased conflict.

KW - urban planning

KW - policy making

KW - time

KW - time horizon

KW - governance

KW - public administration

KW - Conflict management

KW - Belgium

KW - frames

KW - sensemaking

U2 - 10.1177/2399654417712243

DO - 10.1177/2399654417712243

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 340

EP - 356

JO - Environment and Planning C

JF - Environment and Planning C

SN - 2399-6544

IS - 2

ER -