“To work, or not to work, that is the question” – Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism

S. A. Ruhle, H. Breitsohl, E. Aboagye, V. Baba, C. Biron, C. Correia Leal, C. Dietz, A. I. Ferreira, J. Gerich, G. Johns, M. Karanika-Murray, D. Lohaus, A. Løkke, S. L. Lopes, L. F. Martinez, M. Miraglia, B. Muschalla, U. Poethke, N. Sarwat, H. SchadeC. Steidelmüller, S. Vinberg, Z. Whysall, T. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


This position paper brings together recent and emerging developments in the field of presenteeism. A critical synthesis of the evidence is needed due to persisting conceptual and methodological challenges
as well as the increased volume of research in the field. This paper integrates emerging evidence and critical thinking into three areas: (1) concept, (2) measurement and methodological issues, and (3) the context of
presenteeism. First, due to the variety of existing definitions, competing understandings, as well as the notion of positive presenteeism, it is important to reconsider the notion of presenteeism. Second, it is important to reflect on the measurement of the act of presenteeism and the productivity loss associated
with that. Third, following the call to investigate presenteeism in specific contexts, it is important to explain the social, occupational, cross-cultural aspects, as well as the contemporary workplace changes. Based on
this critical synthesis, we conclude by identifying recommendations for future research on presenteeism.
Original languageEnglish
Article number3
Pages (from-to)344-363
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2020
Externally publishedYes


  • Presenteeism
  • Absenteeism
  • Measurement
  • Context
  • Position paper


Dive into the research topics of '“To work, or not to work, that is the question” – Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this