Too big to trial

Lessons from the Urgenda case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Is climate change too big to trial? Is tort law adjudication capable of dealing with a huge public interest like climate change? The answer to these questions is dependent on at least three different issues, namely (i) the possible interpretations of the relevant rules and concepts of tort law, (ii) the possible legitimations of tort law liability, and (iii) the public law questions involved (the constitutional position of the court included). Using the Dutch landmark case of Urgenda Foundation v State of the Netherlands, the author researches the issues involved. The conclusion is that climate change liability stretches the possibilities of tort law adjudication to the max and even beyond, depending on one’s readiness to adjust it to societal problems like climate change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)336-353
Number of pages18
JournalUniform Law Review
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

climate change
Law
liability
public law
legitimation
public interest
Netherlands
interpretation

Cite this

@article{82225abd9357428ea815f690970c273b,
title = "Too big to trial: Lessons from the Urgenda case",
abstract = "Is climate change too big to trial? Is tort law adjudication capable of dealing with a huge public interest like climate change? The answer to these questions is dependent on at least three different issues, namely (i) the possible interpretations of the relevant rules and concepts of tort law, (ii) the possible legitimations of tort law liability, and (iii) the public law questions involved (the constitutional position of the court included). Using the Dutch landmark case of Urgenda Foundation v State of the Netherlands, the author researches the issues involved. The conclusion is that climate change liability stretches the possibilities of tort law adjudication to the max and even beyond, depending on one’s readiness to adjust it to societal problems like climate change.",
author = "Marc Loth",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ulr/uny015",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "336--353",
journal = "Uniform Law Review",
issn = "1124-3694",
number = "2",

}

Too big to trial : Lessons from the Urgenda case. / Loth, Marc.

In: Uniform Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 336-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too big to trial

T2 - Lessons from the Urgenda case

AU - Loth, Marc

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Is climate change too big to trial? Is tort law adjudication capable of dealing with a huge public interest like climate change? The answer to these questions is dependent on at least three different issues, namely (i) the possible interpretations of the relevant rules and concepts of tort law, (ii) the possible legitimations of tort law liability, and (iii) the public law questions involved (the constitutional position of the court included). Using the Dutch landmark case of Urgenda Foundation v State of the Netherlands, the author researches the issues involved. The conclusion is that climate change liability stretches the possibilities of tort law adjudication to the max and even beyond, depending on one’s readiness to adjust it to societal problems like climate change.

AB - Is climate change too big to trial? Is tort law adjudication capable of dealing with a huge public interest like climate change? The answer to these questions is dependent on at least three different issues, namely (i) the possible interpretations of the relevant rules and concepts of tort law, (ii) the possible legitimations of tort law liability, and (iii) the public law questions involved (the constitutional position of the court included). Using the Dutch landmark case of Urgenda Foundation v State of the Netherlands, the author researches the issues involved. The conclusion is that climate change liability stretches the possibilities of tort law adjudication to the max and even beyond, depending on one’s readiness to adjust it to societal problems like climate change.

U2 - 10.1093/ulr/uny015

DO - 10.1093/ulr/uny015

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 336

EP - 353

JO - Uniform Law Review

JF - Uniform Law Review

SN - 1124-3694

IS - 2

ER -