Too close or too far hurts

Cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy

M.N. Meslec, P.L. Curseu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Groups encounter difficulties in becoming better than their individual members. This study assesses the nature of the relationship between cognitive distance (operationalized as the extent to which the best performing individual is detached from the rest of the group) and two types of group synergy: weak cognitive synergy (collective performance is better than average individual performance) and strong cognitive synergy (collective performance exceeds the performance of the best individual in the group). We hypothesized that the relationship between cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy has an inverted U shape and we test this curvilinear relationship in two studies using judgmental and decision-making tasks. The first study shows that cognitive distance is beneficial for both weak and strong group cognitive synergy up to a point and then it becomes detrimental. A second study replicates the findings only for weak and not for strong synergy in a task that evaluates individual and collective rationality in decision making.
Keywords: cognitive distance, group cognitive synergy, group rationality
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-497
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this

@article{623be4202f804684bb34d16ed7e709c8,
title = "Too close or too far hurts: Cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy",
abstract = "Groups encounter difficulties in becoming better than their individual members. This study assesses the nature of the relationship between cognitive distance (operationalized as the extent to which the best performing individual is detached from the rest of the group) and two types of group synergy: weak cognitive synergy (collective performance is better than average individual performance) and strong cognitive synergy (collective performance exceeds the performance of the best individual in the group). We hypothesized that the relationship between cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy has an inverted U shape and we test this curvilinear relationship in two studies using judgmental and decision-making tasks. The first study shows that cognitive distance is beneficial for both weak and strong group cognitive synergy up to a point and then it becomes detrimental. A second study replicates the findings only for weak and not for strong synergy in a task that evaluates individual and collective rationality in decision making.Keywords: cognitive distance, group cognitive synergy, group rationality",
author = "M.N. Meslec and P.L. Curseu",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/1046496413491988",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "471--497",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Too close or too far hurts : Cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy. / Meslec, M.N.; Curseu, P.L.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2013, p. 471-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too close or too far hurts

T2 - Cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy

AU - Meslec, M.N.

AU - Curseu, P.L.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Groups encounter difficulties in becoming better than their individual members. This study assesses the nature of the relationship between cognitive distance (operationalized as the extent to which the best performing individual is detached from the rest of the group) and two types of group synergy: weak cognitive synergy (collective performance is better than average individual performance) and strong cognitive synergy (collective performance exceeds the performance of the best individual in the group). We hypothesized that the relationship between cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy has an inverted U shape and we test this curvilinear relationship in two studies using judgmental and decision-making tasks. The first study shows that cognitive distance is beneficial for both weak and strong group cognitive synergy up to a point and then it becomes detrimental. A second study replicates the findings only for weak and not for strong synergy in a task that evaluates individual and collective rationality in decision making.Keywords: cognitive distance, group cognitive synergy, group rationality

AB - Groups encounter difficulties in becoming better than their individual members. This study assesses the nature of the relationship between cognitive distance (operationalized as the extent to which the best performing individual is detached from the rest of the group) and two types of group synergy: weak cognitive synergy (collective performance is better than average individual performance) and strong cognitive synergy (collective performance exceeds the performance of the best individual in the group). We hypothesized that the relationship between cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy has an inverted U shape and we test this curvilinear relationship in two studies using judgmental and decision-making tasks. The first study shows that cognitive distance is beneficial for both weak and strong group cognitive synergy up to a point and then it becomes detrimental. A second study replicates the findings only for weak and not for strong synergy in a task that evaluates individual and collective rationality in decision making.Keywords: cognitive distance, group cognitive synergy, group rationality

U2 - 10.1177/1046496413491988

DO - 10.1177/1046496413491988

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 471

EP - 497

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 5

ER -