Too Informal? How a Chatbot’s Communication Style Affects Brand Attitude and Quality of Interaction

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study investigated the effects of (in)formal chatbot responses and brand familiarity on social presence, appropriateness, brand attitude, and quality of interaction. An online experiment using a 2 (Communication Style: informal vs. formal) by 2 (Brand: familiar vs. unfamiliar) between subject design was conducted in which participants performed customer service tasks with the assistance of chatbots developed for the study. Subsequently, they filled out an online questionnaire. An indirect effect of communication style on brand attitude and quality of interaction through social presence was found. Thus, a chatbot’s informal communication style induced a higher perceived social presence which in turn positively influenced quality of the interaction and brand attitude. However, brand familiarity did not enhance perceptions of appropriateness, indicating participants do not assign different roles to chatbots as communication partner.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationChatbot Research and Design
    Subtitle of host publication4th International Workshop, CONVERSATIONS 2020, Virtual Event, November 23–24, 2020, Revised Selected Papers
    EditorsAsbjørn Følstad, Theo Araujo, Symeon Papadopoulos, Effie L.-C. Law, Ewa Luger, Morten Goodwin, Petter Bae Brandtzaeg
    Place of PublicationCham
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages16-31
    Number of pages15
    Volume12604
    ISBN (Electronic)9783030682880
    ISBN (Print)9783030682873
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Keywords

    • Chatbots
    • communication style
    • brand attitude
    • Customer service
    • brand familiarity
    • appropriateness

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Too Informal? How a Chatbot’s Communication Style Affects Brand Attitude and Quality of Interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this