Toward an integrative science of social vision in intergroup bias

Arianna Bagnis, Alessia Celeghin, Cristina Onesta Mosso, Marco Tamietto*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Social neuroscience is unveiling how the brain coordinates the construal of social categories and the generation of intergroup biases from facial perception. Recent evidence indicates that social categorization is more sensitive and malleable to elemental facial features than previously assumed. At the same time, perception of social categories can be crafted by top-down factors, including prior knowledge, motivations, and social expectations. In this review, we summarize extant wisdom and propose a model that goes beyond traditional accounts that have conceived stereotypes and prejudices as the end result of “reading out” social categories in the face, and have assumed a hierarchical brain organization. Our model proposes recursive and dynamic interactions amid distant brain regions. Accordingly, the reciprocal exchange of sensory evidence and predictions biases and “explains away” visual input in face perception regions until a compromise is achieved and social perception stabilizes. Ideally, this effort would contribute to shape a research field at the interface between neural and social sciences, which is often referred to as social vision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-326
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume102
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • AMYGDALA ACTIVITY
  • Biased competition
  • Emotion
  • FACIAL AFFECT
  • Face perception
  • IN-GROUP
  • INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
  • Intergroup bias
  • NEURAL MECHANISMS
  • PERCEPTUAL DECISION-MAKING
  • PREFRONTAL CORTEX
  • Predictive coding
  • Prejudices
  • RACE BIAS
  • RACIAL BIAS
  • SPATIAL-FREQUENCY
  • Social vision
  • Stereotypes

Cite this

Bagnis, Arianna ; Celeghin, Alessia ; Mosso, Cristina Onesta ; Tamietto, Marco. / Toward an integrative science of social vision in intergroup bias. In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019 ; Vol. 102. pp. 318-326.
@article{fe459f5268fc447294cdf9e904f44dfe,
title = "Toward an integrative science of social vision in intergroup bias",
abstract = "Social neuroscience is unveiling how the brain coordinates the construal of social categories and the generation of intergroup biases from facial perception. Recent evidence indicates that social categorization is more sensitive and malleable to elemental facial features than previously assumed. At the same time, perception of social categories can be crafted by top-down factors, including prior knowledge, motivations, and social expectations. In this review, we summarize extant wisdom and propose a model that goes beyond traditional accounts that have conceived stereotypes and prejudices as the end result of “reading out” social categories in the face, and have assumed a hierarchical brain organization. Our model proposes recursive and dynamic interactions amid distant brain regions. Accordingly, the reciprocal exchange of sensory evidence and predictions biases and “explains away” visual input in face perception regions until a compromise is achieved and social perception stabilizes. Ideally, this effort would contribute to shape a research field at the interface between neural and social sciences, which is often referred to as social vision.",
keywords = "AMYGDALA ACTIVITY, Biased competition, Emotion, FACIAL AFFECT, Face perception, IN-GROUP, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, Intergroup bias, NEURAL MECHANISMS, PERCEPTUAL DECISION-MAKING, PREFRONTAL CORTEX, Predictive coding, Prejudices, RACE BIAS, RACIAL BIAS, SPATIAL-FREQUENCY, Social vision, Stereotypes",
author = "Arianna Bagnis and Alessia Celeghin and Mosso, {Cristina Onesta} and Marco Tamietto",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.020",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "318--326",
journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
issn = "0149-7634",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Toward an integrative science of social vision in intergroup bias. / Bagnis, Arianna; Celeghin, Alessia; Mosso, Cristina Onesta; Tamietto, Marco.

In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 102, 2019, p. 318-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward an integrative science of social vision in intergroup bias

AU - Bagnis, Arianna

AU - Celeghin, Alessia

AU - Mosso, Cristina Onesta

AU - Tamietto, Marco

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Social neuroscience is unveiling how the brain coordinates the construal of social categories and the generation of intergroup biases from facial perception. Recent evidence indicates that social categorization is more sensitive and malleable to elemental facial features than previously assumed. At the same time, perception of social categories can be crafted by top-down factors, including prior knowledge, motivations, and social expectations. In this review, we summarize extant wisdom and propose a model that goes beyond traditional accounts that have conceived stereotypes and prejudices as the end result of “reading out” social categories in the face, and have assumed a hierarchical brain organization. Our model proposes recursive and dynamic interactions amid distant brain regions. Accordingly, the reciprocal exchange of sensory evidence and predictions biases and “explains away” visual input in face perception regions until a compromise is achieved and social perception stabilizes. Ideally, this effort would contribute to shape a research field at the interface between neural and social sciences, which is often referred to as social vision.

AB - Social neuroscience is unveiling how the brain coordinates the construal of social categories and the generation of intergroup biases from facial perception. Recent evidence indicates that social categorization is more sensitive and malleable to elemental facial features than previously assumed. At the same time, perception of social categories can be crafted by top-down factors, including prior knowledge, motivations, and social expectations. In this review, we summarize extant wisdom and propose a model that goes beyond traditional accounts that have conceived stereotypes and prejudices as the end result of “reading out” social categories in the face, and have assumed a hierarchical brain organization. Our model proposes recursive and dynamic interactions amid distant brain regions. Accordingly, the reciprocal exchange of sensory evidence and predictions biases and “explains away” visual input in face perception regions until a compromise is achieved and social perception stabilizes. Ideally, this effort would contribute to shape a research field at the interface between neural and social sciences, which is often referred to as social vision.

KW - AMYGDALA ACTIVITY

KW - Biased competition

KW - Emotion

KW - FACIAL AFFECT

KW - Face perception

KW - IN-GROUP

KW - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES

KW - Intergroup bias

KW - NEURAL MECHANISMS

KW - PERCEPTUAL DECISION-MAKING

KW - PREFRONTAL CORTEX

KW - Predictive coding

KW - Prejudices

KW - RACE BIAS

KW - RACIAL BIAS

KW - SPATIAL-FREQUENCY

KW - Social vision

KW - Stereotypes

U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.020

DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.020

M3 - Review article

VL - 102

SP - 318

EP - 326

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

SN - 0149-7634

ER -