TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a research agenda for promoting responsible research practices
AU - Tijdink, Joeri
AU - Horbach, Serge P. J. M.
AU - Nuijten, Michèle B.
AU - O'Neill, Gareth
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMw (grant number not applicable).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This opinion piece aims to inform future research funding programs on responsible research practices (RRP) based on three specific objectives: (1) to give a sketch of the current international discussion on responsible research practices (RRPs); (2) to give an overview of current initiatives and already obtained results regarding RRP; and (3) to give an overview of potential future needs for research on RRP. In this opinion piece, we have used seven iterative methodological steps (including literature review, ranking, and sorting exercises) to create the proposed research agenda. We identified six main themes that we believe need attention in future research: (1) responsible evaluation of research and researchers, (2) the influence of open science and transparency on RRP, (3) research on responsible mentoring, supervision, and role modeling, (4) the effect of education and training on RRP, (5) checking for reproducibility, and (6) responsible and fair peer review. These themes have in common that they address aspects of research that are mostly on the level of the scientific system, more than on the level of the individual researcher. Some current initiatives are already gathering substantial empirical evidence to start filling these gaps. We believe that with sufficient support from all relevant stakeholders, more progress can be made.
AB - This opinion piece aims to inform future research funding programs on responsible research practices (RRP) based on three specific objectives: (1) to give a sketch of the current international discussion on responsible research practices (RRPs); (2) to give an overview of current initiatives and already obtained results regarding RRP; and (3) to give an overview of potential future needs for research on RRP. In this opinion piece, we have used seven iterative methodological steps (including literature review, ranking, and sorting exercises) to create the proposed research agenda. We identified six main themes that we believe need attention in future research: (1) responsible evaluation of research and researchers, (2) the influence of open science and transparency on RRP, (3) research on responsible mentoring, supervision, and role modeling, (4) the effect of education and training on RRP, (5) checking for reproducibility, and (6) responsible and fair peer review. These themes have in common that they address aspects of research that are mostly on the level of the scientific system, more than on the level of the individual researcher. Some current initiatives are already gathering substantial empirical evidence to start filling these gaps. We believe that with sufficient support from all relevant stakeholders, more progress can be made.
KW - FRAUD
KW - INCENTIVES
KW - INTEGRITY
KW - MISCONDUCT
KW - SCIENCE
KW - authorship
KW - bias
KW - conflicts of interest
KW - educational research
KW - questionable research practices
KW - research agenda
KW - research ethics
KW - research integrity
KW - responsible research practices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106592272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/15562646211018916
DO - 10.1177/15562646211018916
M3 - Article
VL - 16
SP - 450
EP - 460
JO - Journal of Empirical Reserach on Human Research Ethics
JF - Journal of Empirical Reserach on Human Research Ethics
IS - 4
ER -