Towards an improved implementation of the birds- and habitats directives: An inventory of experiences in Austria, England, Flanders and the Netherlands in relation to two dilemmas

M.E.A. Broekmeyer, Kees Bastmeijer, D.A. Kamphorst

    Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

    10 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Two approaches to achieve conservation objectives in Natura 2000 sites have recently received much attention from the Dutch government. The first approach applies to Natura 2000-sites where active investments in the site’s conservation objectives are stimulated by combining economic development and ecological restoration. The second approach relates to providing space for natural processes or restoration projects with a focus on the functioning of the ecosystem, rather than only species or habitat type specific approaches. While the Ministry of Economic Affairs considers both approaches very promising for speeding up the process towards achieving the Natura 2000 conservation objectives, the approaches can turn into dilemma’s because at least some characteristics of the approaches appear to be problematic in view of the European case law relating to article 6 of the Habitats Directive. The aim of the research was to investigate whether the two dilemmas are also experienced in Austria, England and Flanders and, if so, how they address the legal challenges. This report first discussed the legal framework of article 6 of the Habitats Directive, with special attention for the terms ‘deterioration’ and ‘integrity of the site’, and the precautionary principle. Next, the outcomes of the comparative research are described. In the final part of the report, the main findings have been summarised and the spotlight is turned on the Netherlands again: What could we learn from views and approaches in other Member States and could these lessons learned limit or solve the dilemmas in the Netherlands?
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationWageningen
    PublisherWageningen Environmental Research
    Commissioning bodyMinistry of Economic Affairs, The Netherlands
    Number of pages88
    VolumeReport 2833
    ISBN (Print)1566-7197
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

    Fingerprint

    Austria
    habitat
    Netherlands
    conservation
    restoration
    experience
    European Law
    comparative research
    case law
    ministry
    integrity
    economics

    Keywords

    • Habitats Directive, Birds Directive, Natura 2000, European Court of Justice, deterioration,

    Cite this

    @book{312a403eab7a422ba1d47e39f6394698,
    title = "Towards an improved implementation of the birds- and habitats directives: An inventory of experiences in Austria, England, Flanders and the Netherlands in relation to two dilemmas",
    abstract = "Two approaches to achieve conservation objectives in Natura 2000 sites have recently received much attention from the Dutch government. The first approach applies to Natura 2000-sites where active investments in the site’s conservation objectives are stimulated by combining economic development and ecological restoration. The second approach relates to providing space for natural processes or restoration projects with a focus on the functioning of the ecosystem, rather than only species or habitat type specific approaches. While the Ministry of Economic Affairs considers both approaches very promising for speeding up the process towards achieving the Natura 2000 conservation objectives, the approaches can turn into dilemma’s because at least some characteristics of the approaches appear to be problematic in view of the European case law relating to article 6 of the Habitats Directive. The aim of the research was to investigate whether the two dilemmas are also experienced in Austria, England and Flanders and, if so, how they address the legal challenges. This report first discussed the legal framework of article 6 of the Habitats Directive, with special attention for the terms ‘deterioration’ and ‘integrity of the site’, and the precautionary principle. Next, the outcomes of the comparative research are described. In the final part of the report, the main findings have been summarised and the spotlight is turned on the Netherlands again: What could we learn from views and approaches in other Member States and could these lessons learned limit or solve the dilemmas in the Netherlands?",
    keywords = "Habitats Directive, Birds Directive, Natura 2000, European Court of Justice, deterioration,",
    author = "M.E.A. Broekmeyer and Kees Bastmeijer and D.A. Kamphorst",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "1566-7197",
    volume = "Report 2833",
    publisher = "Wageningen Environmental Research",

    }

    Towards an improved implementation of the birds- and habitats directives : An inventory of experiences in Austria, England, Flanders and the Netherlands in relation to two dilemmas. / Broekmeyer, M.E.A.; Bastmeijer, Kees; Kamphorst, D.A.

    Wageningen : Wageningen Environmental Research, 2017. 88 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Towards an improved implementation of the birds- and habitats directives

    T2 - An inventory of experiences in Austria, England, Flanders and the Netherlands in relation to two dilemmas

    AU - Broekmeyer, M.E.A.

    AU - Bastmeijer, Kees

    AU - Kamphorst, D.A.

    PY - 2017/9

    Y1 - 2017/9

    N2 - Two approaches to achieve conservation objectives in Natura 2000 sites have recently received much attention from the Dutch government. The first approach applies to Natura 2000-sites where active investments in the site’s conservation objectives are stimulated by combining economic development and ecological restoration. The second approach relates to providing space for natural processes or restoration projects with a focus on the functioning of the ecosystem, rather than only species or habitat type specific approaches. While the Ministry of Economic Affairs considers both approaches very promising for speeding up the process towards achieving the Natura 2000 conservation objectives, the approaches can turn into dilemma’s because at least some characteristics of the approaches appear to be problematic in view of the European case law relating to article 6 of the Habitats Directive. The aim of the research was to investigate whether the two dilemmas are also experienced in Austria, England and Flanders and, if so, how they address the legal challenges. This report first discussed the legal framework of article 6 of the Habitats Directive, with special attention for the terms ‘deterioration’ and ‘integrity of the site’, and the precautionary principle. Next, the outcomes of the comparative research are described. In the final part of the report, the main findings have been summarised and the spotlight is turned on the Netherlands again: What could we learn from views and approaches in other Member States and could these lessons learned limit or solve the dilemmas in the Netherlands?

    AB - Two approaches to achieve conservation objectives in Natura 2000 sites have recently received much attention from the Dutch government. The first approach applies to Natura 2000-sites where active investments in the site’s conservation objectives are stimulated by combining economic development and ecological restoration. The second approach relates to providing space for natural processes or restoration projects with a focus on the functioning of the ecosystem, rather than only species or habitat type specific approaches. While the Ministry of Economic Affairs considers both approaches very promising for speeding up the process towards achieving the Natura 2000 conservation objectives, the approaches can turn into dilemma’s because at least some characteristics of the approaches appear to be problematic in view of the European case law relating to article 6 of the Habitats Directive. The aim of the research was to investigate whether the two dilemmas are also experienced in Austria, England and Flanders and, if so, how they address the legal challenges. This report first discussed the legal framework of article 6 of the Habitats Directive, with special attention for the terms ‘deterioration’ and ‘integrity of the site’, and the precautionary principle. Next, the outcomes of the comparative research are described. In the final part of the report, the main findings have been summarised and the spotlight is turned on the Netherlands again: What could we learn from views and approaches in other Member States and could these lessons learned limit or solve the dilemmas in the Netherlands?

    KW - Habitats Directive, Birds Directive, Natura 2000, European Court of Justice, deterioration,

    M3 - Report

    SN - 1566-7197

    VL - Report 2833

    BT - Towards an improved implementation of the birds- and habitats directives

    PB - Wageningen Environmental Research

    CY - Wageningen

    ER -