Tracing selection effects in three non-probability samples

C Barendregt*, A van der Poel, D van de Mheen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Snowball sampling and targeted sampling are widely applied techniques to recruit samples from hidden populations, such as problematic drug users. The disadvantage is that they yield non-probability samples which cannot be generalised to the population. Despite thorough preparatory mapping procedures, selection effects continue to occur. This paper proposes an interpretation frame that allows estimating the direction of selection bias after data collection. Critical examination of the recruitment procedure and comparison with statistical and non-statistical external data sources are the core features of the interpretation frame. Applying the interpretation frame increases insight into the reliability of the results and allows to estimate where selection bias may have occurred.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-131
JournalEuropean Addiction Research
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • illegal drug use
  • hidden populations
  • snowball sampling
  • HIDDEN POPULATIONS
  • USERS
  • DRUG

Cite this

Barendregt, C ; van der Poel, A ; van de Mheen, D. / Tracing selection effects in three non-probability samples. In: European Addiction Research. 2005 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 124-131.
@article{51c95b63ed144ebeae22b04e4c9294b7,
title = "Tracing selection effects in three non-probability samples",
abstract = "Snowball sampling and targeted sampling are widely applied techniques to recruit samples from hidden populations, such as problematic drug users. The disadvantage is that they yield non-probability samples which cannot be generalised to the population. Despite thorough preparatory mapping procedures, selection effects continue to occur. This paper proposes an interpretation frame that allows estimating the direction of selection bias after data collection. Critical examination of the recruitment procedure and comparison with statistical and non-statistical external data sources are the core features of the interpretation frame. Applying the interpretation frame increases insight into the reliability of the results and allows to estimate where selection bias may have occurred.",
keywords = "illegal drug use, hidden populations, snowball sampling, HIDDEN POPULATIONS, USERS, DRUG",
author = "C Barendregt and {van der Poel}, A and {van de Mheen}, D",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1159/000085547",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "124--131",
journal = "European Addiction Research",
issn = "1022-6877",
publisher = "Karger",
number = "3",

}

Tracing selection effects in three non-probability samples. / Barendregt, C; van der Poel, A; van de Mheen, D.

In: European Addiction Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2005, p. 124-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tracing selection effects in three non-probability samples

AU - Barendregt, C

AU - van der Poel, A

AU - van de Mheen, D

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Snowball sampling and targeted sampling are widely applied techniques to recruit samples from hidden populations, such as problematic drug users. The disadvantage is that they yield non-probability samples which cannot be generalised to the population. Despite thorough preparatory mapping procedures, selection effects continue to occur. This paper proposes an interpretation frame that allows estimating the direction of selection bias after data collection. Critical examination of the recruitment procedure and comparison with statistical and non-statistical external data sources are the core features of the interpretation frame. Applying the interpretation frame increases insight into the reliability of the results and allows to estimate where selection bias may have occurred.

AB - Snowball sampling and targeted sampling are widely applied techniques to recruit samples from hidden populations, such as problematic drug users. The disadvantage is that they yield non-probability samples which cannot be generalised to the population. Despite thorough preparatory mapping procedures, selection effects continue to occur. This paper proposes an interpretation frame that allows estimating the direction of selection bias after data collection. Critical examination of the recruitment procedure and comparison with statistical and non-statistical external data sources are the core features of the interpretation frame. Applying the interpretation frame increases insight into the reliability of the results and allows to estimate where selection bias may have occurred.

KW - illegal drug use

KW - hidden populations

KW - snowball sampling

KW - HIDDEN POPULATIONS

KW - USERS

KW - DRUG

U2 - 10.1159/000085547

DO - 10.1159/000085547

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 124

EP - 131

JO - European Addiction Research

JF - European Addiction Research

SN - 1022-6877

IS - 3

ER -