Trading‐off innovation novelty and information protection in supplier selection for a new product development project: Supplier ties as signals

Tingting Yan*, Yang Yang, Kevin Dooley, Sangho Chae

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A supplier's interorganizational ties can be a source of novelty as well as information leakage risk when a buyer involves suppliers in a new product development project. We use signaling theory to explain how supplier ties affect a purchasing manager's perception of suppliers. Three types of supplier ties are considered: ties with external innovation partners, with customers outside the buying firm's industry, and with the buying firm's competitors. We posit that managers use supplier ties as signals to indicate a supplier's potential in contributing to innovation novelty or information protection. Results from two scenario‐based experiments with practicing managers support most of our hypotheses. When innovation novelty is the goal, managers perceive other‐industry customer ties and external innovation ties as positive signals, while competitor ties as a negative signal. When information protection is the goal, all three types of ties are perceived negatively. When both goals are considered, information protection has a greater influence than innovation novelty on the final supplier selection likelihood.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)933-957
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume66
Issue number7-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • behavioral experiment
  • conjoint analysis
  • information protection
  • innovation novelty
  • signaling theory
  • supplier selection
  • supplier ties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trading‐off innovation novelty and information protection in supplier selection for a new product development project: Supplier ties as signals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Jack Meredith Best Paper Award Honorable Mention

    Yan, T. (Recipient), Dooley, K. (Recipient), Yang, Y. (Recipient) & Chae, S. (Recipient), 2021

    Prize

Cite this