Trust and technology in collaborative consumption

Why it is not just about you and me

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Trust relations online cannot be analyzed as mere interpersonal interactions because of the new complexity mediating technology brings forth. Based on the work of the German philosopher Helmuth Plessner (1975), I will argue that distance is constitutive of men’s life form and that the endeavour to bridge this ontological gap, for example by producing technology, is an important driving force in human action. Human beings are artificial by nature (Plessner 1975). They have to mould their own world and create a balance they are deprived of by nature.. Artefacts, when they enter the domain of culture, gain their own momentum, they possess a kind of objectivity that stands apart from their creators (de Mul 2003, 261).Nonetheless, technology par excellence holds an utopian -and therefore misleading- promise of not just bridging this ontological distance but of overcoming it (de Mul 2001). Online users are enabled to collaborate in a way that resembles interaction based on reputation and face-to-face contacts in small communities. Botsman (2012) claims that: “trust will become the currency of the new economy”. I will make a case that trust through technology as Botsman describes it will not lead to interpersonal trust as we know it from direct interaction, but will result in what I call interpersonal system trust, with an active role for technology in building and shaping these trust relations. In view of the fact that technology can bridge but cannot overcome distance, bringing along new complexity, it is not enough to simply translate cues of interpersonal trust to an online environment. In analyzing trust online, one has to take into account the specific workings of the online technology, its mediation (Verbeek 2011b), to see if and how measures have to be taken to ensure trustworthy online interaction. I will suggest that at least four aspects of internet technology need to be taken into account when analyzing online trust: context, code, company, and country
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBridging distances in technology and regulation
Pages135-150
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameBridging distances in technology and regulation

Fingerprint

interaction
new economy
objectivity
currency
reputation
mediation
artifact
contact
Internet
human being
community

Keywords

  • collaborative consumption
  • internet
  • luhmann
  • plessner
  • trust

Cite this

Keymolen, E. (2013). Trust and technology in collaborative consumption: Why it is not just about you and me. In Bridging distances in technology and regulation (pp. 135-150). (Bridging distances in technology and regulation).
Keymolen, E. / Trust and technology in collaborative consumption : Why it is not just about you and me. Bridging distances in technology and regulation. 2013. pp. 135-150 (Bridging distances in technology and regulation).
@inbook{9bca931a8bb34b08a331e093dd454554,
title = "Trust and technology in collaborative consumption: Why it is not just about you and me",
abstract = "Trust relations online cannot be analyzed as mere interpersonal interactions because of the new complexity mediating technology brings forth. Based on the work of the German philosopher Helmuth Plessner (1975), I will argue that distance is constitutive of men’s life form and that the endeavour to bridge this ontological gap, for example by producing technology, is an important driving force in human action. Human beings are artificial by nature (Plessner 1975). They have to mould their own world and create a balance they are deprived of by nature.. Artefacts, when they enter the domain of culture, gain their own momentum, they possess a kind of objectivity that stands apart from their creators (de Mul 2003, 261).Nonetheless, technology par excellence holds an utopian -and therefore misleading- promise of not just bridging this ontological distance but of overcoming it (de Mul 2001). Online users are enabled to collaborate in a way that resembles interaction based on reputation and face-to-face contacts in small communities. Botsman (2012) claims that: “trust will become the currency of the new economy”. I will make a case that trust through technology as Botsman describes it will not lead to interpersonal trust as we know it from direct interaction, but will result in what I call interpersonal system trust, with an active role for technology in building and shaping these trust relations. In view of the fact that technology can bridge but cannot overcome distance, bringing along new complexity, it is not enough to simply translate cues of interpersonal trust to an online environment. In analyzing trust online, one has to take into account the specific workings of the online technology, its mediation (Verbeek 2011b), to see if and how measures have to be taken to ensure trustworthy online interaction. I will suggest that at least four aspects of internet technology need to be taken into account when analyzing online trust: context, code, company, and country",
keywords = "collaborative consumption, internet, luhmann, plessner, trust",
author = "E. Keymolen",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789058509864",
series = "Bridging distances in technology and regulation",
pages = "135--150",
booktitle = "Bridging distances in technology and regulation",

}

Keymolen, E 2013, Trust and technology in collaborative consumption: Why it is not just about you and me. in Bridging distances in technology and regulation. Bridging distances in technology and regulation, pp. 135-150.

Trust and technology in collaborative consumption : Why it is not just about you and me. / Keymolen, E.

Bridging distances in technology and regulation. 2013. p. 135-150 (Bridging distances in technology and regulation).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Trust and technology in collaborative consumption

T2 - Why it is not just about you and me

AU - Keymolen, E.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Trust relations online cannot be analyzed as mere interpersonal interactions because of the new complexity mediating technology brings forth. Based on the work of the German philosopher Helmuth Plessner (1975), I will argue that distance is constitutive of men’s life form and that the endeavour to bridge this ontological gap, for example by producing technology, is an important driving force in human action. Human beings are artificial by nature (Plessner 1975). They have to mould their own world and create a balance they are deprived of by nature.. Artefacts, when they enter the domain of culture, gain their own momentum, they possess a kind of objectivity that stands apart from their creators (de Mul 2003, 261).Nonetheless, technology par excellence holds an utopian -and therefore misleading- promise of not just bridging this ontological distance but of overcoming it (de Mul 2001). Online users are enabled to collaborate in a way that resembles interaction based on reputation and face-to-face contacts in small communities. Botsman (2012) claims that: “trust will become the currency of the new economy”. I will make a case that trust through technology as Botsman describes it will not lead to interpersonal trust as we know it from direct interaction, but will result in what I call interpersonal system trust, with an active role for technology in building and shaping these trust relations. In view of the fact that technology can bridge but cannot overcome distance, bringing along new complexity, it is not enough to simply translate cues of interpersonal trust to an online environment. In analyzing trust online, one has to take into account the specific workings of the online technology, its mediation (Verbeek 2011b), to see if and how measures have to be taken to ensure trustworthy online interaction. I will suggest that at least four aspects of internet technology need to be taken into account when analyzing online trust: context, code, company, and country

AB - Trust relations online cannot be analyzed as mere interpersonal interactions because of the new complexity mediating technology brings forth. Based on the work of the German philosopher Helmuth Plessner (1975), I will argue that distance is constitutive of men’s life form and that the endeavour to bridge this ontological gap, for example by producing technology, is an important driving force in human action. Human beings are artificial by nature (Plessner 1975). They have to mould their own world and create a balance they are deprived of by nature.. Artefacts, when they enter the domain of culture, gain their own momentum, they possess a kind of objectivity that stands apart from their creators (de Mul 2003, 261).Nonetheless, technology par excellence holds an utopian -and therefore misleading- promise of not just bridging this ontological distance but of overcoming it (de Mul 2001). Online users are enabled to collaborate in a way that resembles interaction based on reputation and face-to-face contacts in small communities. Botsman (2012) claims that: “trust will become the currency of the new economy”. I will make a case that trust through technology as Botsman describes it will not lead to interpersonal trust as we know it from direct interaction, but will result in what I call interpersonal system trust, with an active role for technology in building and shaping these trust relations. In view of the fact that technology can bridge but cannot overcome distance, bringing along new complexity, it is not enough to simply translate cues of interpersonal trust to an online environment. In analyzing trust online, one has to take into account the specific workings of the online technology, its mediation (Verbeek 2011b), to see if and how measures have to be taken to ensure trustworthy online interaction. I will suggest that at least four aspects of internet technology need to be taken into account when analyzing online trust: context, code, company, and country

KW - collaborative consumption

KW - internet

KW - luhmann

KW - plessner

KW - trust

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/trust-technology-collaborative-consumption-it-not-just-about-me

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789058509864

T3 - Bridging distances in technology and regulation

SP - 135

EP - 150

BT - Bridging distances in technology and regulation

ER -

Keymolen E. Trust and technology in collaborative consumption: Why it is not just about you and me. In Bridging distances in technology and regulation. 2013. p. 135-150. (Bridging distances in technology and regulation).