Abstract
“In Are living beings extended autopoietic systems? An embodied reply”, Villalobos and Razeto-Barry offer an articulation of the embodied aspect of the autopoietic theory. Their aim is to block the extended interpretation of this theory. For them, living beings are, simply put, autopoietic bodies. In this commentary, I advance two concerns regarding the alleged cases of extended living beings. On the one hand, I argue that their proposal fails to account for the intuitive difference between these cases and living beings that are embedded in the environment. On the other hand, I argue that, from the perspective offered by the authors, there also seems to be a problem in the way the boundaries of a system are delineated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 41-42 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Adaptive Behavior |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Feb 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Autopoiesis
- Extended Cognition
- Extended Autopoietic Systems
- Enactivism