TY - JOUR
T1 - Two challenges to the embodied version of the autopoietic theory
AU - Clavel Vázquez, María Jimena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - “In Are living beings extended autopoietic systems? An embodied reply”, Villalobos and Razeto-Barry offer an articulation of the embodied aspect of the autopoietic theory. Their aim is to block the extended interpretation of this theory. For them, living beings are, simply put, autopoietic bodies. In this commentary, I advance two concerns regarding the alleged cases of extended living beings. On the one hand, I argue that their proposal fails to account for the intuitive difference between these cases and living beings that are embedded in the environment. On the other hand, I argue that, from the perspective offered by the authors, there also seems to be a problem in the way the boundaries of a system are delineated.
AB - “In Are living beings extended autopoietic systems? An embodied reply”, Villalobos and Razeto-Barry offer an articulation of the embodied aspect of the autopoietic theory. Their aim is to block the extended interpretation of this theory. For them, living beings are, simply put, autopoietic bodies. In this commentary, I advance two concerns regarding the alleged cases of extended living beings. On the one hand, I argue that their proposal fails to account for the intuitive difference between these cases and living beings that are embedded in the environment. On the other hand, I argue that, from the perspective offered by the authors, there also seems to be a problem in the way the boundaries of a system are delineated.
KW - Autopoiesis
KW - enactivism
KW - extended autopoietic systems
KW - extended cognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064190352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1059712319839641
DO - 10.1177/1059712319839641
M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor
AN - SCOPUS:85064190352
SN - 1059-7123
VL - 28
SP - 41
EP - 42
JO - Adaptive Behavior
JF - Adaptive Behavior
IS - 1
ER -