Understanding complex governance relationships in food safety regulation: The RIT model as a theoretical lens

Tetty Havinga, Paul Verbruggen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this contribution we discuss the added value of the RIT model for the analysis of complex governance relationships in the regulation of food safety. By exploring regimes of food safety involving the European Union and the Global Food Safety Initiative, we highlight the diverse and complex relationships among the actors in public, private and hybrid regimes of food safety regulation. Using schematic figures, we extend the basic RIT model to more closely fit the reality of (hybrid) governance relationships in the modern regulation of food safety. We argue that the model usefully facilitates the disaggregation of these regimes into analytical sub-units or ‘regulatory chains’, in which each actor in its own way contributes to and affects the regulatory process. Finally, we critically assess what the RIT model adds to alternative theoretical approaches in identifying, mapping and explaining the different roles actors play vis-à-vis others in regulatory regimes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-77
Number of pages20
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences
Volume670
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Fingerprint

governance
food
regulation
regime
disaggregation
value added

Cite this

@article{72ec8fd14bd147f58f98fd5e47e59ae9,
title = "Understanding complex governance relationships in food safety regulation: The RIT model as a theoretical lens",
abstract = "In this contribution we discuss the added value of the RIT model for the analysis of complex governance relationships in the regulation of food safety. By exploring regimes of food safety involving the European Union and the Global Food Safety Initiative, we highlight the diverse and complex relationships among the actors in public, private and hybrid regimes of food safety regulation. Using schematic figures, we extend the basic RIT model to more closely fit the reality of (hybrid) governance relationships in the modern regulation of food safety. We argue that the model usefully facilitates the disaggregation of these regimes into analytical sub-units or ‘regulatory chains’, in which each actor in its own way contributes to and affects the regulatory process. Finally, we critically assess what the RIT model adds to alternative theoretical approaches in identifying, mapping and explaining the different roles actors play vis-{\`a}-vis others in regulatory regimes.",
author = "Tetty Havinga and Paul Verbruggen",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0002716216688872",
language = "English",
volume = "670",
pages = "58--77",
journal = "Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences",
issn = "0002-7162",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Understanding complex governance relationships in food safety regulation : The RIT model as a theoretical lens. / Havinga, Tetty; Verbruggen, Paul.

In: Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences , Vol. 670, No. 1, 03.2017, p. 58-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding complex governance relationships in food safety regulation

T2 - The RIT model as a theoretical lens

AU - Havinga, Tetty

AU - Verbruggen, Paul

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - In this contribution we discuss the added value of the RIT model for the analysis of complex governance relationships in the regulation of food safety. By exploring regimes of food safety involving the European Union and the Global Food Safety Initiative, we highlight the diverse and complex relationships among the actors in public, private and hybrid regimes of food safety regulation. Using schematic figures, we extend the basic RIT model to more closely fit the reality of (hybrid) governance relationships in the modern regulation of food safety. We argue that the model usefully facilitates the disaggregation of these regimes into analytical sub-units or ‘regulatory chains’, in which each actor in its own way contributes to and affects the regulatory process. Finally, we critically assess what the RIT model adds to alternative theoretical approaches in identifying, mapping and explaining the different roles actors play vis-à-vis others in regulatory regimes.

AB - In this contribution we discuss the added value of the RIT model for the analysis of complex governance relationships in the regulation of food safety. By exploring regimes of food safety involving the European Union and the Global Food Safety Initiative, we highlight the diverse and complex relationships among the actors in public, private and hybrid regimes of food safety regulation. Using schematic figures, we extend the basic RIT model to more closely fit the reality of (hybrid) governance relationships in the modern regulation of food safety. We argue that the model usefully facilitates the disaggregation of these regimes into analytical sub-units or ‘regulatory chains’, in which each actor in its own way contributes to and affects the regulatory process. Finally, we critically assess what the RIT model adds to alternative theoretical approaches in identifying, mapping and explaining the different roles actors play vis-à-vis others in regulatory regimes.

U2 - 10.1177/0002716216688872

DO - 10.1177/0002716216688872

M3 - Article

VL - 670

SP - 58

EP - 77

JO - Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences

JF - Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences

SN - 0002-7162

IS - 1

ER -