Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative worldview framework”

Annick Hedlund-deWitt, Patricia Osseweijer, Robin Pierce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-88
Number of pages12
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biotechnology
biotechnology
worldview
Social sciences
Lenses
Innovation
World View
Public Perception
social science
stakeholder
innovation
economy
demand

Cite this

@article{f674271ff2ae4684a51fd69827807035,
title = "Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative worldview framework”",
abstract = "Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues.",
author = "Annick Hedlund-deWitt and Patricia Osseweijer and Robin Pierce",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0963662515592364",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "70--88",
journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
issn = "0963-6625",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative worldview framework”. / Hedlund-deWitt, Annick ; Osseweijer, Patricia; Pierce, Robin.

In: Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 26, No. 1, 03.07.2015, p. 70-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative worldview framework”

AU - Hedlund-deWitt, Annick

AU - Osseweijer, Patricia

AU - Pierce, Robin

PY - 2015/7/3

Y1 - 2015/7/3

N2 - Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues.

AB - Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues.

U2 - 10.1177/0963662515592364

DO - 10.1177/0963662515592364

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 70

EP - 88

JO - Public Understanding of Science

JF - Public Understanding of Science

SN - 0963-6625

IS - 1

ER -