Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground

A pragmatic approach

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract


De Hert and Kamara analyse the provision of the legitimate interest ground in the new EU data protection framework, the General Data Protection Regulation. The authors explain that the rationale of the legitimate interest ground is that under certain conditions, controllers’ or third parties’ interests might be justified to prevail over the interests, rights, and freedoms of the data subject. When and how the prevailing may take place under the GDPR provisions is not a one-dimensional assessment. De Hert and Kamara suggest a formalisation of the legitimate interest ground steps towards the decision of the controller on whether to base his or her processing on the legitimate interest ground. They argue that the legitimate interest ground should not be seen in isolation, but through the lens of the data protection principles of Article 5 GDPR and Article 8 Charter Fundamental Rights EU. The authors further analyse the relevant case law of the Court of Justice EU, as well as the cases of Network and Information Security and Big Data and Profiling. Kamara and De Hert conclude that the legitimate interest of the controller is not a loophole in the data protection legislation, as it has often been criticised, but an equivalent basis for lawful processing, that can distinct controllers in bad faith from controllers processing data in good faith
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCambridge handbook of consumer privacy
EditorsEvan Selinger, Jules Polonetsky, Omer Tene
Chapter19
Pages321-352
Number of pages32
Edition1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

data protection
pragmatics
EU
faith
court of justice
fundamental right
formalization
case law
charter
social isolation
legislation
regulation

Cite this

Kamara, I., & de Hert, P. (2018). Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground: A pragmatic approach. In E. Selinger, J. Polonetsky, & O. Tene (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of consumer privacy (1 ed., pp. 321-352)
Kamara, Irene ; de Hert, Paul. / Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground : A pragmatic approach. Cambridge handbook of consumer privacy. editor / Evan Selinger ; Jules Polonetsky ; Omer Tene. 1. ed. 2018. pp. 321-352
@inbook{6188f8b854334da9a07721df5b3d7a7d,
title = "Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground: A pragmatic approach",
abstract = "De Hert and Kamara analyse the provision of the legitimate interest ground in the new EU data protection framework, the General Data Protection Regulation. The authors explain that the rationale of the legitimate interest ground is that under certain conditions, controllers’ or third parties’ interests might be justified to prevail over the interests, rights, and freedoms of the data subject. When and how the prevailing may take place under the GDPR provisions is not a one-dimensional assessment. De Hert and Kamara suggest a formalisation of the legitimate interest ground steps towards the decision of the controller on whether to base his or her processing on the legitimate interest ground. They argue that the legitimate interest ground should not be seen in isolation, but through the lens of the data protection principles of Article 5 GDPR and Article 8 Charter Fundamental Rights EU. The authors further analyse the relevant case law of the Court of Justice EU, as well as the cases of Network and Information Security and Big Data and Profiling. Kamara and De Hert conclude that the legitimate interest of the controller is not a loophole in the data protection legislation, as it has often been criticised, but an equivalent basis for lawful processing, that can distinct controllers in bad faith from controllers processing data in good faith",
author = "Irene Kamara and {de Hert}, Paul",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107181106",
pages = "321--352",
editor = "Selinger, {Evan } and Polonetsky, {Jules } and Tene, {Omer }",
booktitle = "Cambridge handbook of consumer privacy",
edition = "1",

}

Kamara, I & de Hert, P 2018, Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground: A pragmatic approach. in E Selinger, J Polonetsky & O Tene (eds), Cambridge handbook of consumer privacy. 1 edn, pp. 321-352.

Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground : A pragmatic approach. / Kamara, Irene; de Hert, Paul.

Cambridge handbook of consumer privacy. ed. / Evan Selinger; Jules Polonetsky; Omer Tene. 1. ed. 2018. p. 321-352.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground

T2 - A pragmatic approach

AU - Kamara, Irene

AU - de Hert, Paul

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - De Hert and Kamara analyse the provision of the legitimate interest ground in the new EU data protection framework, the General Data Protection Regulation. The authors explain that the rationale of the legitimate interest ground is that under certain conditions, controllers’ or third parties’ interests might be justified to prevail over the interests, rights, and freedoms of the data subject. When and how the prevailing may take place under the GDPR provisions is not a one-dimensional assessment. De Hert and Kamara suggest a formalisation of the legitimate interest ground steps towards the decision of the controller on whether to base his or her processing on the legitimate interest ground. They argue that the legitimate interest ground should not be seen in isolation, but through the lens of the data protection principles of Article 5 GDPR and Article 8 Charter Fundamental Rights EU. The authors further analyse the relevant case law of the Court of Justice EU, as well as the cases of Network and Information Security and Big Data and Profiling. Kamara and De Hert conclude that the legitimate interest of the controller is not a loophole in the data protection legislation, as it has often been criticised, but an equivalent basis for lawful processing, that can distinct controllers in bad faith from controllers processing data in good faith

AB - De Hert and Kamara analyse the provision of the legitimate interest ground in the new EU data protection framework, the General Data Protection Regulation. The authors explain that the rationale of the legitimate interest ground is that under certain conditions, controllers’ or third parties’ interests might be justified to prevail over the interests, rights, and freedoms of the data subject. When and how the prevailing may take place under the GDPR provisions is not a one-dimensional assessment. De Hert and Kamara suggest a formalisation of the legitimate interest ground steps towards the decision of the controller on whether to base his or her processing on the legitimate interest ground. They argue that the legitimate interest ground should not be seen in isolation, but through the lens of the data protection principles of Article 5 GDPR and Article 8 Charter Fundamental Rights EU. The authors further analyse the relevant case law of the Court of Justice EU, as well as the cases of Network and Information Security and Big Data and Profiling. Kamara and De Hert conclude that the legitimate interest of the controller is not a loophole in the data protection legislation, as it has often been criticised, but an equivalent basis for lawful processing, that can distinct controllers in bad faith from controllers processing data in good faith

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107181106

SP - 321

EP - 352

BT - Cambridge handbook of consumer privacy

A2 - Selinger, Evan

A2 - Polonetsky, Jules

A2 - Tene, Omer

ER -

Kamara I, de Hert P. Understanding the balancing act behind the legitimate interest of the controller ground: A pragmatic approach. In Selinger E, Polonetsky J, Tene O, editors, Cambridge handbook of consumer privacy. 1 ed. 2018. p. 321-352