Unpacking logM

Toward a more general theory of party system density

D. Lowery, S. Otjes, S. Gherghina, A. van Witteloostuijn, G. Péli, H. Brasher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)921-935
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

party system
ecology
political system
voting
district
interpretation

Cite this

Lowery, D., Otjes, S., Gherghina, S., van Witteloostuijn, A., Péli, G., & Brasher, H. (2010). Unpacking logM: Toward a more general theory of party system density. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 921-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x
Lowery, D. ; Otjes, S. ; Gherghina, S. ; van Witteloostuijn, A. ; Péli, G. ; Brasher, H. / Unpacking logM : Toward a more general theory of party system density. In: American Journal of Political Science. 2010 ; Vol. 54, No. 4. pp. 921-935.
@article{4c6b2e74bc4f4d5b8524d3d6d6a14fb7,
title = "Unpacking logM: Toward a more general theory of party system density",
abstract = "The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.",
author = "D. Lowery and S. Otjes and S. Gherghina and {van Witteloostuijn}, A. and G. P{\'e}li and H. Brasher",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "921--935",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Lowery, D, Otjes, S, Gherghina, S, van Witteloostuijn, A, Péli, G & Brasher, H 2010, 'Unpacking logM: Toward a more general theory of party system density', American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 921-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x

Unpacking logM : Toward a more general theory of party system density. / Lowery, D.; Otjes, S.; Gherghina, S.; van Witteloostuijn, A.; Péli, G.; Brasher, H.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2010, p. 921-935.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking logM

T2 - Toward a more general theory of party system density

AU - Lowery, D.

AU - Otjes, S.

AU - Gherghina, S.

AU - van Witteloostuijn, A.

AU - Péli, G.

AU - Brasher, H.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.

AB - The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 921

EP - 935

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 4

ER -