Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Tilburg University Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research output
Research units
Activities
Projects
Press/Media
Prizes
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Unreliable heterogeneity: how measurement errorobscures heterogeneity in meta-analyses inpsychology
A. Olsson Collentine
*
,
M. Bakker
,
J. Wicherts
*
Corresponding author for this work
Methodology and Statistics
Research output
:
Working paper
›
Scientific
69
Downloads (Pure)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Unreliable heterogeneity: how measurement errorobscures heterogeneity in meta-analyses inpsychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Measurement Error
100%
Meta-analysis
100%
Metaanalysis
40%
Mean Effect
40%
Practice Theory
20%
Monte Carlo Simulation
20%
Unreliability
20%
High Reliability
20%
Psychological Research
20%
System Size
20%
Classical Test Theory
20%
Effect Size Estimation
20%
Large Variance
20%
Observed Effects
20%
Largest Mean
20%
Study Reliability
20%
Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modeling (MASEM)
20%
Average Reliability
20%
Social Sciences
Meta-Analysis
100%
Variance
50%
Test Theory
50%
Structural Equation Modeling
50%
Psychological Research
50%
Practice Theory
50%
Psychology
Measurement Error
100%
Meta-Analysis
100%
Psychological Research
20%
Classical Test Theory
20%