Validation of a short and generic Qualitative Job Insecurity Scale (QUAL-JIS)

Gabriel Fischmann*, Hans De Witte, Coralia Sulea, Tinne Elst Vander, Nele De Cuyper, Dragos Iliescu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
152 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Qualitative Job Insecurity Scale (QUAL-JIS) has been used in job insecurity (JI) research for the past 9 years, without formal validation. The goal of the current study was to test the scale s psychometric properties. We checked the scale s reliability, as well as its validity, investigating evidence based on the scale s content, internal structure, and relations to other variables (convergent and discriminant, predictive and concurrent, as well as incremental predictive evidence). We additionally evaluated its cross-country and longitudinal invariance over three measurement times (6 months apart) in two countries (Romania and Belgium; NRO = 388, NBE = 1,992). We found evidence for the scale s reliability and validity, QUAL-JIS showing partial scalar invariance across time and between the two countries. Interestingly, qualitative JI measured with QUAL-JIS explained additional variance in the employees need for recovery above and beyond another popular qualitative JI scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-411
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • cross-country
  • longitudinal
  • qualitative job insecurity
  • scale validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of a short and generic Qualitative Job Insecurity Scale (QUAL-JIS)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this