Abstract
Aims:
Screening for depression is recommended internationally. The World Health Organization's 5-item Well-being Index (WHO-5) is used clinically to screen for depression but its empirical suitability for this purpose is not well documented. We investigated the psychometric properties of the WHO-5 and its suitability for identifying likely depression in Australian adults with diabetes.
Methods:
The Diabetes MILES -Australia study dataset provided a sample of N = 3249 who completed the WHO-5 (positively-worded 5-item measure of emotional well-being) and the PHQ-9 (9-item measure of depressive symptoms). Analyses were conducted for the full sample, and separately by diabetes type and treatment (type 1, non-insulin-treated type 2, and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes). Construct (convergent and factorial) validity and reliability of the WHO-5 were examined. ROC analyses were used to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the WHO-5 as a depression screening instrument, comparing two commonly used WHO-5 cut-off values (
Results:
For the whole sample, the WHO-5 demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability (a = 0.90) and convergent validity with the PHQ-9 (r = -0.73, p <0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis partially supported factorial validity:.2(5) = 834.94, p <0.001; RMSEA = 0.23, 90% CI 0.21-0.24; CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.96; factor loadings = 0.78-0.92. The AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.86-0.89, p <0.001). The sensitivity/specificity of the WHO-5 for detecting likely depression was 0.44/ 0.96 for the
Conclusions:
These findings support use of a WHO-5 cut-point of
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 27-35 |
Journal | Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice |
Volume | 132 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Diabetes mellitus
- Depression
- Surveys and questionnaires
- Psychometrics
- Factor analysis
- statistical
- ROC curve
- WELL-BEING-INDEX
- PRIMARY-CARE
- OUTPATIENTS
- PEOPLE
- ASSOCIATION
- DISTRESS
- VALIDITY
- QUALITY
- TOOLS
- PHQ-9