Abstract
Background:
Following guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC), the current study validated the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument in participants who underwent coronary angiography.
Methods:
314 participants (Mage = 69.7 ± 12.0; 69 % male) completed the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument and validated comparison scales to measure depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), Type D personality (DS14), work stress (ERI), family stress (SMSS), trauma (PC-PTSD), and anger and hostility (Z-scale of MMPI-2).
Results:
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the psychosocial risk factors were separate entities rather than a signs or symptoms of a single broad indication of distress (CFI = .872, RMSEA = .056, SRMR = .058). Intraclass coefficients (ICC), kappa and diagnostic accuracy indicators (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curves, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values [PPV; NPV]) indicated that most screener scales were sufficient to good. We also compared patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD; n = 213) to those with no current CHD (n = 100) and found overall similar results.
Discussion:
The German version of the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument has an acceptable performance. Aside from minor improvements, the screening instrument could be implemented in the cardiological practice to screen patients on multidimensional psychosocial risk.
Following guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC), the current study validated the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument in participants who underwent coronary angiography.
Methods:
314 participants (Mage = 69.7 ± 12.0; 69 % male) completed the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument and validated comparison scales to measure depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), Type D personality (DS14), work stress (ERI), family stress (SMSS), trauma (PC-PTSD), and anger and hostility (Z-scale of MMPI-2).
Results:
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the psychosocial risk factors were separate entities rather than a signs or symptoms of a single broad indication of distress (CFI = .872, RMSEA = .056, SRMR = .058). Intraclass coefficients (ICC), kappa and diagnostic accuracy indicators (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curves, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values [PPV; NPV]) indicated that most screener scales were sufficient to good. We also compared patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD; n = 213) to those with no current CHD (n = 100) and found overall similar results.
Discussion:
The German version of the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument has an acceptable performance. Aside from minor improvements, the screening instrument could be implemented in the cardiological practice to screen patients on multidimensional psychosocial risk.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 76-97 |
| Journal | Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- coronary heart disease
- prevention
- psychosocial risk factors
- screening