Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance

B. Burgemeestre, J Hulstijn, Y Tan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Compliance is often achieved ‘by design’ through a coherent system of controls consisting of information systems and procedures. This system-based control requires a new approach to auditing in which companies must demonstrate to the regulator that they are ‘in control’. They must determine the relevance of a regulation for their business, justify which set of control measures they have taken to comply with it, and demonstrate that the control measures are operationally effective. In this paper we show how value-based argumentation theory can be applied to the compliance domain. Corporate values motivate the selection of control measures (actions) which aim to fulfill control objectives, i.e. adopted norms (goals). In particular, we show how to formalize the audit dialogue in which companies justify their compliance decisions to regulators using value-based argumentation. The approach is illustrated by a case study of the safety and security measures adopted in the context of EU customs regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-186
Number of pages38
JournalArtificial Intelligence and Law: An International Journal
Volume19
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

argumentation
Values
regulation
Industry
auditing
Compliance
audit
information system
Information systems
EU
dialogue

Keywords

  • compliance
  • audit dialogue
  • argumentation theory

Cite this

@article{3e7e5d7f444b4700a936397efef42066,
title = "Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance",
abstract = "Compliance is often achieved ‘by design’ through a coherent system of controls consisting of information systems and procedures. This system-based control requires a new approach to auditing in which companies must demonstrate to the regulator that they are ‘in control’. They must determine the relevance of a regulation for their business, justify which set of control measures they have taken to comply with it, and demonstrate that the control measures are operationally effective. In this paper we show how value-based argumentation theory can be applied to the compliance domain. Corporate values motivate the selection of control measures (actions) which aim to fulfill control objectives, i.e. adopted norms (goals). In particular, we show how to formalize the audit dialogue in which companies justify their compliance decisions to regulators using value-based argumentation. The approach is illustrated by a case study of the safety and security measures adopted in the context of EU customs regulation.",
keywords = "compliance, audit dialogue, argumentation theory",
author = "B. Burgemeestre and J Hulstijn and Y Tan",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s10506-011-9113-4",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "149--186",
journal = "Artificial Intelligence and Law: An International Journal",
issn = "0924-8463",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2-3",

}

Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance. / Burgemeestre, B.; Hulstijn, J; Tan, Y.

In: Artificial Intelligence and Law: An International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2-3, 2011, p. 149-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance

AU - Burgemeestre, B.

AU - Hulstijn, J

AU - Tan, Y

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Compliance is often achieved ‘by design’ through a coherent system of controls consisting of information systems and procedures. This system-based control requires a new approach to auditing in which companies must demonstrate to the regulator that they are ‘in control’. They must determine the relevance of a regulation for their business, justify which set of control measures they have taken to comply with it, and demonstrate that the control measures are operationally effective. In this paper we show how value-based argumentation theory can be applied to the compliance domain. Corporate values motivate the selection of control measures (actions) which aim to fulfill control objectives, i.e. adopted norms (goals). In particular, we show how to formalize the audit dialogue in which companies justify their compliance decisions to regulators using value-based argumentation. The approach is illustrated by a case study of the safety and security measures adopted in the context of EU customs regulation.

AB - Compliance is often achieved ‘by design’ through a coherent system of controls consisting of information systems and procedures. This system-based control requires a new approach to auditing in which companies must demonstrate to the regulator that they are ‘in control’. They must determine the relevance of a regulation for their business, justify which set of control measures they have taken to comply with it, and demonstrate that the control measures are operationally effective. In this paper we show how value-based argumentation theory can be applied to the compliance domain. Corporate values motivate the selection of control measures (actions) which aim to fulfill control objectives, i.e. adopted norms (goals). In particular, we show how to formalize the audit dialogue in which companies justify their compliance decisions to regulators using value-based argumentation. The approach is illustrated by a case study of the safety and security measures adopted in the context of EU customs regulation.

KW - compliance

KW - audit dialogue

KW - argumentation theory

U2 - 10.1007/s10506-011-9113-4

DO - 10.1007/s10506-011-9113-4

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 149

EP - 186

JO - Artificial Intelligence and Law: An International Journal

JF - Artificial Intelligence and Law: An International Journal

SN - 0924-8463

IS - 2-3

ER -