Valuing prevention: Lessons and recommendations from a Dutch expert committee

A. Rotteveel, S. Knies, A. de Wit, J.J. Polder, B. Wouterse*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

ntroduction
Countries have been struggling with investments in prevention. How to obtain insight in the costs, benefits, and budgetary impacts of investments in prevention? And how to weigh investments in prevention against other investments in health, such as in curative health care. In the Netherlands, in 2023, a methodological expert committee was established to answer such questions. Their advice, published in January 2024, has been impactful, receiving much attention in Dutch politics and policy and leading to the establishment of a subsequent scientific committee on appropriate evidence and the development of an investment model for prevention.

Areas covered
In this perspective, we present the main recommendations from the advice and embed these recommendations in the Dutch institutional context. Furthermore, we highlight why the financing of prevention is challenging and suggest some solutions. Finally, we discuss how the advice was received and what follow-up was given, reflect on why this advice had such a large impact, and distill recommendations for other countries from this experience.

Expert opinion
Economic evaluation of prevention is not intrinsically more challenging than that of other health investments. For a direct comparison of investments in health, similar methods should be used for both prevention and medical care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)849-854
Number of pages6
JournalExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • prevention
  • economic evaluation
  • budgetary impact
  • costs
  • expert advice
  • implications
  • societal perspective

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Valuing prevention: Lessons and recommendations from a Dutch expert committee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this