Abstract
This article examines the theme of Christ’s incarnation, focusing in particular on the question of the organization and animation of his corporeality, as evinced in question three of the second distinction of Duns Scotus’ commentary on the third book of Peter Lombard’s Sentences. The discussion will allow us to analyze the various positions that oscillate between a temporal primacy and a natural primacy of the body’s constitution concerning the fact of incarnation. In this regard, the theory of the plurality of forms presents itself as a key to understanding the particular perspective of the Doctor subtilis, in which the instant of incarnation is proposed as the union of the human and the divine.
| Original language | Spanish |
|---|---|
| Article number | MF 124 (2023) |
| Pages (from-to) | 451 |
| Number of pages | 483 |
| Journal | Miscellanea Francescana, 123 I-II (2023) p. 57-85 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue number | 0026-587X |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Duns Scotus
- corporeality
- Scotist antrhropology
- Incarnation
- christocentrism
- Christology
- plurality of forms
- philosophical anthropology
- Theological hermeneutics
- antropologie
- beatitudes
- Homo viator
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver