Voluntary collective pensions: a viable alternative?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    This contribution discusses the central thesis in Michael Otsuka's book that collective pensions can be organized on a voluntary basis from the recent experience with pension reform in the Netherlands. Despite a long tradition of collective-funded pensions organized in a decentralized way by social partners, basis reform was necessary as population ageing made it increasingly harder to maintain the intergenerational solidarity implicit in these pensions. Although it is well-established that risk sharing between generations can be beneficial and welfare improving to all, it is far from certain that new generations will enter existing pension arrangements on a voluntary basis. First, there is a considerable 'discontinuity risk' if deficits in pension funding - caused by bad shocks - deter younger generations from entering the scheme. Second, even if it is to their own interest most people do not voluntarily engage in pension schemes due to several kinds of behavioural and psychological barriers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)199-205
    Number of pages7
    JournalEconomics & Philosophy
    Volume41
    Issue number1
    Early online dateJan 2025
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

    Keywords

    • Collective pensions
    • Discontinuity risk
    • Intergenerational risk sharing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Voluntary collective pensions: a viable alternative?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this