Voting on punishment systems within a heterogeneous group

C.N. Noussair, F. Tan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We consider a voluntary contributions game, in which players may punish others after contributions are made and observed. The productivity of contributions, as captured in the marginal-per-capita return, differs among individuals, so that there are two types: high and low productivity. Every two or eight periods, depending on the treatment, individuals vote on a punishment regime, in which certain individuals are permitted, but not required, to have punishment directed toward them. The punishment system can condition on type and contribution history. The results indicate that the most effective regime, in terms of contributions and earnings, is one that allows punishment of low contributors only, regardless of productivity. Nevertheless, only a minority of sessions converge to this system, indicating a tendency for the voting process to lead to suboptimal institutional choice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-693
JournalJournal of Public Economic Theory
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Voting on punishment systems within a heterogeneous group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this