@inbook{1e83530319d84a75bab99c854d1264f6,
title = "War and the use of force in old regime Europe",
abstract = "This chapter explores the justification and legitimisation of war and {\textquoteleft}imperfect{\textquoteright} uses of force both in legal scholarship and diplomatic practice. The Grotian synthesis of {\textquoteleft}just{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}formal{\textquoteright} war entered mainstream scholarship and reached its full explanatory force in the work of Vattel. The resilience of just war in the face of its impracticality among sovereign state in scholarship can, among other, be explained by the fact that the subtle interplay of two conceptions of law in fields of legal application - , gelled well with diplomatic practice. Whereas states applied the jus in bello and jus post bellum with regards to claims to the justice of the war, the just war doctrine remained a common discourse for the justification of resort to war and force and added an instrument to the toolbox of alliances diplomacy.",
keywords = "history of international law, Early Modern Europe, jus ad bellum, use of force law, war",
author = "Randall Lesaffer",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1017/9781108757355.018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781108485616",
volume = "6",
series = "The Cambridge history of international law",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
pages = "495--516",
editor = "Randall Lesaffer",
booktitle = "The Cambridge history of international law",
address = "United Kingdom",
}