War and the use of force in old regime Europe

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter explores the justification and legitimisation of war and ‘imperfect’ uses of force both in legal scholarship and diplomatic practice. The Grotian synthesis of ‘just’ and ‘formal’ war entered mainstream scholarship and reached its full explanatory force in the work of Vattel. The resilience of just war in the face of its impracticality among sovereign state in scholarship can, among other, be explained by the fact that the subtle interplay of two conceptions of law in fields of legal application - , gelled well with diplomatic practice. Whereas states applied the jus in bello and jus post bellum with regards to claims to the justice of the war, the just war doctrine remained a common discourse for the justification of resort to war and force and added an instrument to the toolbox of alliances diplomacy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge history of international law
Subtitle of host publicationInternational law in early modern Europe
EditorsRandall Lesaffer
Place of PublicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter15
Pages495-516
Number of pages22
Volume6
ISBN (Electronic)9781108757355
ISBN (Print)9781108485616
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Publication series

NameThe Cambridge history of international law
PublisherCambridge University Press
Volume6

Keywords

  • history of international law
  • Early Modern Europe
  • jus ad bellum
  • use of force law
  • war

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'War and the use of force in old regime Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this