Wat niet weg is, is gezien. Een analyse van art. 54a Sr in het licht van een Notice-and-Take-Down-regime

    Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

    Abstract

    The report specifically addresses the question whether art. 54a of the Dutch Penal Code allows a public prosecutor to order an Internet Service Provider to take down materials uploaded by Internet users. Cycris found that art. 54a DPC is not a sufficient legal base for such an order. Cycris's main objection is that there are insufficient guarantees built into the process to protect the interests of Internet users and the information freedoms. The Dutch Minister of justice has adopted the results of the Cycris research and has announced that the law will be amended.
    Original languageDutch
    Place of PublicationNijmegen
    PublisherCycris
    Number of pages49
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Cite this

    @book{ecd27838006c416caaa341dce663b9f0,
    title = "Wat niet weg is, is gezien. Een analyse van art. 54a Sr in het licht van een Notice-and-Take-Down-regime",
    abstract = "The report specifically addresses the question whether art. 54a of the Dutch Penal Code allows a public prosecutor to order an Internet Service Provider to take down materials uploaded by Internet users. Cycris found that art. 54a DPC is not a sufficient legal base for such an order. Cycris's main objection is that there are insufficient guarantees built into the process to protect the interests of Internet users and the information freedoms. The Dutch Minister of justice has adopted the results of the Cycris research and has announced that the law will be amended.",
    author = "M.H.M. Schellekens and E.J. Koops and W.G. Teepe",
    note = "Pagination: 49",
    year = "2008",
    language = "Dutch",
    publisher = "Cycris",

    }

    Wat niet weg is, is gezien. Een analyse van art. 54a Sr in het licht van een Notice-and-Take-Down-regime. / Schellekens, M.H.M.; Koops, E.J.; Teepe, W.G.

    Nijmegen : Cycris, 2008. 49 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Wat niet weg is, is gezien. Een analyse van art. 54a Sr in het licht van een Notice-and-Take-Down-regime

    AU - Schellekens, M.H.M.

    AU - Koops, E.J.

    AU - Teepe, W.G.

    N1 - Pagination: 49

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - The report specifically addresses the question whether art. 54a of the Dutch Penal Code allows a public prosecutor to order an Internet Service Provider to take down materials uploaded by Internet users. Cycris found that art. 54a DPC is not a sufficient legal base for such an order. Cycris's main objection is that there are insufficient guarantees built into the process to protect the interests of Internet users and the information freedoms. The Dutch Minister of justice has adopted the results of the Cycris research and has announced that the law will be amended.

    AB - The report specifically addresses the question whether art. 54a of the Dutch Penal Code allows a public prosecutor to order an Internet Service Provider to take down materials uploaded by Internet users. Cycris found that art. 54a DPC is not a sufficient legal base for such an order. Cycris's main objection is that there are insufficient guarantees built into the process to protect the interests of Internet users and the information freedoms. The Dutch Minister of justice has adopted the results of the Cycris research and has announced that the law will be amended.

    M3 - Report

    BT - Wat niet weg is, is gezien. Een analyse van art. 54a Sr in het licht van een Notice-and-Take-Down-regime

    PB - Cycris

    CY - Nijmegen

    ER -