Webcare across public and private social networking sites: How stakeholders and the Netherlands Red Cross adapt their messages to channel affordances and constraints

C. Liebrecht, Charlotte van Hooijdonk

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Previous research has focused on message characteristics of public webcare conversations. However, webcare conversations are increasingly held on private social networking sites. Little is known to what extent organizations and stakeholders adapt their messages to the affordances of these channels. Employing the uses and gratifications theory, this paper reports on a content analysis of webcare conversations (n = 423) between stakeholders and the Netherlands Red Cross on public and private social networking sites. The stakeholder motives and organizational communication style were analyzed. The findings reveal private channels mainly serve the purpose of customer service: stakeholders approach the organization with questions; the organization uses message personalization to enhance the experience of one-to-one communication. Public social networking sites mainly serve the purpose of reputation management: stakeholders post remarks and compliments; the organization adapts the communication style of its messages to the affordances of the individual platform. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)375-398
    Number of pages24
    JournalPsychology of Language and Communication
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Keywords

    • webcare
    • social networking sites
    • channel affordances
    • the Netherlands Red Cross
    • uses and gratifications theory
    • communication style

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Webcare across public and private social networking sites: How stakeholders and the Netherlands Red Cross adapt their messages to channel affordances and constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this