Welfare capitalism: The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA

Bruce Headey, R.J. Muffels

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper assesses the ten year (1987-96) impact of taxes and transfers on poverty, income inequality and financial insecurity in the working age populations of the Netherlands, the USA and West Germany. These are the only countries for which ten consecutive years of socio-economic panel survey data are available, so they afford a unique opportunity to assess the medium to long term performance of governments in achieving key equity goals. It is indeed fortunate that Germany, the Netherlands and the USA are the three countries for which long running panels exist, because they can be taken as ‘best cases’ of Gosta Esping-Andersen’s ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism’ (1990). In Esping-Andersen’s terms the USA is the prototypical liberal capitalist system and Germany is the clearest case of a conservative, corporatist welfare - capitalist state. The Netherlands from the mid-1980s onwards is classified by Esping-Andersen as a social democratic welfare-capitalist state, although it is clearly a borderline judgment, since the Netherlands has progressive social benefits but does not have the other defining characteristic of social democracy (according to Esping-Andersen’s slightly Swedocentric view) of commitment to active labor market programs.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCombating poverty in Europe
Subtitle of host publicationThe German welfare regime in practice
EditorsP. Krause, G. Backer , W. Hanesch
Place of PublicationLondon/New York
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter2
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)13-978-1-315-19842-2
ISBN (Print)13-978-1-138-70926-3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Poverty
Capitalism
West Germany
Government
Financial risk
The Netherlands
Germany
Socio-economics
Equity
Survey data
Capitalist systems
Social democracy
Tax
Long-term performance
Active labour market programmes
Income inequality
Social benefits

Cite this

Headey, B., & Muffels, R. J. (2018). Welfare capitalism: The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA. In P. Krause, G. Backer , & W. Hanesch (Eds.), Combating poverty in Europe: The German welfare regime in practice London/New York: Routledge.
Headey, Bruce ; Muffels, R.J. / Welfare capitalism : The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA. Combating poverty in Europe: The German welfare regime in practice. editor / P. Krause ; G. Backer ; W. Hanesch. London/New York : Routledge, 2018.
@inbook{cacdcccee0f2403ab2922d9caba43649,
title = "Welfare capitalism: The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA",
abstract = "This paper assesses the ten year (1987-96) impact of taxes and transfers on poverty, income inequality and financial insecurity in the working age populations of the Netherlands, the USA and West Germany. These are the only countries for which ten consecutive years of socio-economic panel survey data are available, so they afford a unique opportunity to assess the medium to long term performance of governments in achieving key equity goals. It is indeed fortunate that Germany, the Netherlands and the USA are the three countries for which long running panels exist, because they can be taken as ‘best cases’ of Gosta Esping-Andersen’s ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism’ (1990). In Esping-Andersen’s terms the USA is the prototypical liberal capitalist system and Germany is the clearest case of a conservative, corporatist welfare - capitalist state. The Netherlands from the mid-1980s onwards is classified by Esping-Andersen as a social democratic welfare-capitalist state, although it is clearly a borderline judgment, since the Netherlands has progressive social benefits but does not have the other defining characteristic of social democracy (according to Esping-Andersen’s slightly Swedocentric view) of commitment to active labor market programs.",
author = "Bruce Headey and R.J. Muffels",
note = "First published 2003 by Ashgate Publishing. Reissued 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 ThirdAvenue, New York, NY 10017, USA",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "13-978-1-138-70926-3",
editor = "P. Krause and { Backer }, G. and W. Hanesch",
booktitle = "Combating poverty in Europe",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Headey, B & Muffels, RJ 2018, Welfare capitalism: The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA. in P Krause, G Backer & W Hanesch (eds), Combating poverty in Europe: The German welfare regime in practice. Routledge, London/New York.

Welfare capitalism : The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA. / Headey, Bruce; Muffels, R.J.

Combating poverty in Europe: The German welfare regime in practice. ed. / P. Krause; G. Backer ; W. Hanesch. London/New York : Routledge, 2018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Welfare capitalism

T2 - The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA

AU - Headey, Bruce

AU - Muffels, R.J.

N1 - First published 2003 by Ashgate Publishing. Reissued 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 ThirdAvenue, New York, NY 10017, USA

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - This paper assesses the ten year (1987-96) impact of taxes and transfers on poverty, income inequality and financial insecurity in the working age populations of the Netherlands, the USA and West Germany. These are the only countries for which ten consecutive years of socio-economic panel survey data are available, so they afford a unique opportunity to assess the medium to long term performance of governments in achieving key equity goals. It is indeed fortunate that Germany, the Netherlands and the USA are the three countries for which long running panels exist, because they can be taken as ‘best cases’ of Gosta Esping-Andersen’s ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism’ (1990). In Esping-Andersen’s terms the USA is the prototypical liberal capitalist system and Germany is the clearest case of a conservative, corporatist welfare - capitalist state. The Netherlands from the mid-1980s onwards is classified by Esping-Andersen as a social democratic welfare-capitalist state, although it is clearly a borderline judgment, since the Netherlands has progressive social benefits but does not have the other defining characteristic of social democracy (according to Esping-Andersen’s slightly Swedocentric view) of commitment to active labor market programs.

AB - This paper assesses the ten year (1987-96) impact of taxes and transfers on poverty, income inequality and financial insecurity in the working age populations of the Netherlands, the USA and West Germany. These are the only countries for which ten consecutive years of socio-economic panel survey data are available, so they afford a unique opportunity to assess the medium to long term performance of governments in achieving key equity goals. It is indeed fortunate that Germany, the Netherlands and the USA are the three countries for which long running panels exist, because they can be taken as ‘best cases’ of Gosta Esping-Andersen’s ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism’ (1990). In Esping-Andersen’s terms the USA is the prototypical liberal capitalist system and Germany is the clearest case of a conservative, corporatist welfare - capitalist state. The Netherlands from the mid-1980s onwards is classified by Esping-Andersen as a social democratic welfare-capitalist state, although it is clearly a borderline judgment, since the Netherlands has progressive social benefits but does not have the other defining characteristic of social democracy (according to Esping-Andersen’s slightly Swedocentric view) of commitment to active labor market programs.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 13-978-1-138-70926-3

BT - Combating poverty in Europe

A2 - Krause, P.

A2 - Backer , G.

A2 - Hanesch, W.

PB - Routledge

CY - London/New York

ER -

Headey B, Muffels RJ. Welfare capitalism: The ten year impact of governments on poverty, inequality and financial risk in West Germany, the Netherlands and the USA. In Krause P, Backer G, Hanesch W, editors, Combating poverty in Europe: The German welfare regime in practice. London/New York: Routledge. 2018