What do housing wealth and tenure have to do with it?

Changes in wellbeing of men and women after divorce using Australian panel data

Stéfanie André*, Caroline Dewilde, Ruud Muffels

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Homeownership, as a way to build up housing wealth, is believed to play an increasingly important role in terms of providing welfare to citizens. However, homeownership does not always act as a nest-egg; it can be a source of financial anxiety as well. In this paper we investigate how homeownership and housing
wealth impact on the relationship between divorce and subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction, happiness, financial satisfaction). Using longitudinal data for Australia we find that homeowners are more negatively affected with respect to wellbeing by divorce than tenants, amongst others because the owned house
becomes a financial burden. We further find that gender moderates the impact of homeownership and tenure change upon divorce on wellbeing. When women move from an owned to a rented house, divorce has a smaller negative effect on happiness and financial satisfaction than when women stay in the owned
house. For men, staying in the owned house or moving within the owner-occupied sector increases happiness, but moving to the rental sector from the owned house increases financial satisfaction.
Furthermore, for men, housing wealth mitigates financial stress when remaining in an owner-occupied house after divorce. We conclude that the potential role of homeownership as a welfare resource – in this case for subjective well-being – seems rather limited to those who already possess other resources (e.g.
financial security) and therefore cannot be expected to substitute more traditional forms of welfare.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-118
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume78
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

divorce
housing
happiness
welfare
homeowner
resources
well-being
anxiety
citizen
gender

Keywords

  • Homeownership
  • Housing wealth
  • Divorce
  • Subjective wellbeing
  • Panel analysis
  • Australia
  • WELFARE-STATE
  • LIFE SATISFACTION
  • HOME OWNERSHIP
  • HOMEOWNERSHIP
  • FAMILY
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • MARRIAGE
  • PATHWAYS
  • IMPACT
  • UNION

Cite this

@article{db64a2b364114346a240fec6cb097f53,
title = "What do housing wealth and tenure have to do with it?: Changes in wellbeing of men and women after divorce using Australian panel data",
abstract = "Homeownership, as a way to build up housing wealth, is believed to play an increasingly important role in terms of providing welfare to citizens. However, homeownership does not always act as a nest-egg; it can be a source of financial anxiety as well. In this paper we investigate how homeownership and housingwealth impact on the relationship between divorce and subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction, happiness, financial satisfaction). Using longitudinal data for Australia we find that homeowners are more negatively affected with respect to wellbeing by divorce than tenants, amongst others because the owned housebecomes a financial burden. We further find that gender moderates the impact of homeownership and tenure change upon divorce on wellbeing. When women move from an owned to a rented house, divorce has a smaller negative effect on happiness and financial satisfaction than when women stay in the ownedhouse. For men, staying in the owned house or moving within the owner-occupied sector increases happiness, but moving to the rental sector from the owned house increases financial satisfaction.Furthermore, for men, housing wealth mitigates financial stress when remaining in an owner-occupied house after divorce. We conclude that the potential role of homeownership as a welfare resource – in this case for subjective well-being – seems rather limited to those who already possess other resources (e.g.financial security) and therefore cannot be expected to substitute more traditional forms of welfare.",
keywords = "Homeownership, Housing wealth, Divorce, Subjective wellbeing, Panel analysis, Australia, WELFARE-STATE, LIFE SATISFACTION, HOME OWNERSHIP, HOMEOWNERSHIP, FAMILY, CONSEQUENCES, MARRIAGE, PATHWAYS, IMPACT, UNION",
author = "St{\'e}fanie Andr{\'e} and Caroline Dewilde and Ruud Muffels",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.017",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "104--118",
journal = "Social Science Research",
issn = "0049-089x",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "1",

}

What do housing wealth and tenure have to do with it? Changes in wellbeing of men and women after divorce using Australian panel data. / André, Stéfanie; Dewilde, Caroline; Muffels, Ruud.

In: Social Science Research, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2019, p. 104-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What do housing wealth and tenure have to do with it?

T2 - Changes in wellbeing of men and women after divorce using Australian panel data

AU - André, Stéfanie

AU - Dewilde, Caroline

AU - Muffels, Ruud

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Homeownership, as a way to build up housing wealth, is believed to play an increasingly important role in terms of providing welfare to citizens. However, homeownership does not always act as a nest-egg; it can be a source of financial anxiety as well. In this paper we investigate how homeownership and housingwealth impact on the relationship between divorce and subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction, happiness, financial satisfaction). Using longitudinal data for Australia we find that homeowners are more negatively affected with respect to wellbeing by divorce than tenants, amongst others because the owned housebecomes a financial burden. We further find that gender moderates the impact of homeownership and tenure change upon divorce on wellbeing. When women move from an owned to a rented house, divorce has a smaller negative effect on happiness and financial satisfaction than when women stay in the ownedhouse. For men, staying in the owned house or moving within the owner-occupied sector increases happiness, but moving to the rental sector from the owned house increases financial satisfaction.Furthermore, for men, housing wealth mitigates financial stress when remaining in an owner-occupied house after divorce. We conclude that the potential role of homeownership as a welfare resource – in this case for subjective well-being – seems rather limited to those who already possess other resources (e.g.financial security) and therefore cannot be expected to substitute more traditional forms of welfare.

AB - Homeownership, as a way to build up housing wealth, is believed to play an increasingly important role in terms of providing welfare to citizens. However, homeownership does not always act as a nest-egg; it can be a source of financial anxiety as well. In this paper we investigate how homeownership and housingwealth impact on the relationship between divorce and subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction, happiness, financial satisfaction). Using longitudinal data for Australia we find that homeowners are more negatively affected with respect to wellbeing by divorce than tenants, amongst others because the owned housebecomes a financial burden. We further find that gender moderates the impact of homeownership and tenure change upon divorce on wellbeing. When women move from an owned to a rented house, divorce has a smaller negative effect on happiness and financial satisfaction than when women stay in the ownedhouse. For men, staying in the owned house or moving within the owner-occupied sector increases happiness, but moving to the rental sector from the owned house increases financial satisfaction.Furthermore, for men, housing wealth mitigates financial stress when remaining in an owner-occupied house after divorce. We conclude that the potential role of homeownership as a welfare resource – in this case for subjective well-being – seems rather limited to those who already possess other resources (e.g.financial security) and therefore cannot be expected to substitute more traditional forms of welfare.

KW - Homeownership

KW - Housing wealth

KW - Divorce

KW - Subjective wellbeing

KW - Panel analysis

KW - Australia

KW - WELFARE-STATE

KW - LIFE SATISFACTION

KW - HOME OWNERSHIP

KW - HOMEOWNERSHIP

KW - FAMILY

KW - CONSEQUENCES

KW - MARRIAGE

KW - PATHWAYS

KW - IMPACT

KW - UNION

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.017

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 104

EP - 118

JO - Social Science Research

JF - Social Science Research

SN - 0049-089x

IS - 1

ER -