What do you think is "fair"? Effects of ingroup norms and outcome control on fairness judgments

G. Hertel, H. Aarts, M. Zeelenberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    46 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Two studies are reported that examine whether fairness judgments in dyadic exchange situations are influenced by descriptive ingroup norms or the interdependence structure of the exchange situation. In both studies, these factors were varied within a minimal group categorization paradigm. Results showed that ingroup norms affected fairness judgments when participants interacted with another group member and interaction outcomes could be affected by this partner. However, in interactions with group members who could not influence the outcome of the partners no effects of ingroup norms were observed. Together, the results suggest that persons do not simply assimilate their fairness judgments to the normative context of their group, but adapt fairness judgments rather strategically to the expected behavior of their interaction partner in order to maintain general equality or reciprocity principles. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)327-341
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume32
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Cite this

    @article{436c483583b84896a454208b8fe23cb2,
    title = "What do you think is {"}fair{"}? Effects of ingroup norms and outcome control on fairness judgments",
    abstract = "Two studies are reported that examine whether fairness judgments in dyadic exchange situations are influenced by descriptive ingroup norms or the interdependence structure of the exchange situation. In both studies, these factors were varied within a minimal group categorization paradigm. Results showed that ingroup norms affected fairness judgments when participants interacted with another group member and interaction outcomes could be affected by this partner. However, in interactions with group members who could not influence the outcome of the partners no effects of ingroup norms were observed. Together, the results suggest that persons do not simply assimilate their fairness judgments to the normative context of their group, but adapt fairness judgments rather strategically to the expected behavior of their interaction partner in order to maintain general equality or reciprocity principles. Copyright {\circledC} 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
    author = "G. Hertel and H. Aarts and M. Zeelenberg",
    year = "2002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "327--341",
    journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
    issn = "0046-2772",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    What do you think is "fair"? Effects of ingroup norms and outcome control on fairness judgments. / Hertel, G.; Aarts, H.; Zeelenberg, M.

    In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2002, p. 327-341.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What do you think is "fair"? Effects of ingroup norms and outcome control on fairness judgments

    AU - Hertel, G.

    AU - Aarts, H.

    AU - Zeelenberg, M.

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - Two studies are reported that examine whether fairness judgments in dyadic exchange situations are influenced by descriptive ingroup norms or the interdependence structure of the exchange situation. In both studies, these factors were varied within a minimal group categorization paradigm. Results showed that ingroup norms affected fairness judgments when participants interacted with another group member and interaction outcomes could be affected by this partner. However, in interactions with group members who could not influence the outcome of the partners no effects of ingroup norms were observed. Together, the results suggest that persons do not simply assimilate their fairness judgments to the normative context of their group, but adapt fairness judgments rather strategically to the expected behavior of their interaction partner in order to maintain general equality or reciprocity principles. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    AB - Two studies are reported that examine whether fairness judgments in dyadic exchange situations are influenced by descriptive ingroup norms or the interdependence structure of the exchange situation. In both studies, these factors were varied within a minimal group categorization paradigm. Results showed that ingroup norms affected fairness judgments when participants interacted with another group member and interaction outcomes could be affected by this partner. However, in interactions with group members who could not influence the outcome of the partners no effects of ingroup norms were observed. Together, the results suggest that persons do not simply assimilate their fairness judgments to the normative context of their group, but adapt fairness judgments rather strategically to the expected behavior of their interaction partner in order to maintain general equality or reciprocity principles. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 327

    EP - 341

    JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

    JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

    SN - 0046-2772

    IS - 3

    ER -