What is central to political belief system networks?

M.J. Brandt*, C.G. Sibley, D. Osborne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A central challenge for identifying core components of a belief system is examining the position of components within the structure of the entire belief system. We test whether operational (i.e., positions on issues) or symbolic (i.e., affective attachments to political groups and labels) components are most central by modeling a political belief system as a network of interconnected attitudes and beliefs. Across seven waves of representative panel data from New Zealand, we find that symbolic components are more central than operational components ( ds range = 0.78-0.97). Symbolic components were also closer than operational components in the network to self-reported voting ( d = -2.43), proenvironmental actions ( ds = -1.71 and -1.63), and religious behaviors ( d = -0.74). These findings are consistent with perspectives that emphasize the importance of symbolic politics in tying belief systems together and motivating behavior, and further the link between political belief system research and network science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1352-1364
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume45
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • ATTITUDES
  • BASES
  • BIAS
  • DIMENSIONS
  • DYNAMICS
  • IDEOLOGY
  • ISSUES
  • PARTISAN
  • PARTY
  • PERSONALITY
  • belief systems
  • identity
  • networks
  • political policies
  • political psychology

Cite this