Abstract
We develop a theory and empirical test of how the legal system affects the relationship between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. The theory uses a double moral hazard framework to show how optimal contracts and investor actions depend on the quality of the legal system. The empirical evidence is based on a sample of European venture capital deals. The main results are that with better legal protection, investors give more non-contractible support and demand more downside protection. These predictions are supported by the empirical analysis. Using a new empirical approach of comparing two sets of fixed-effect regressions, we also find that the investor’s legal system is more important than that of the company in determining investor behavior.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Tilburg |
| Publisher | Finance |
| Number of pages | 67 |
| Volume | 2008-30 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Publication series
| Name | CentER Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2008-30 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Financial Intermediation
- Law and Finance
- Corporate Governance
- Venture Capital
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What is the Role of Legal Systems in Financial Intermediation? Theory and Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver