What we (should) talk about when we talk about fruitfulness

Silvia Ivani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

What are the relevant values to the appraisal of research programs? This question remains hotly debated, as philosophers have recently proposed many lists of values potentially relevant to scientific appraisal. Surprisingly, despite being mentioned in many lists, little attention has been paid to fruitfulness. It is unclear how fruitfulness should be explicated, and whether it has any substantial role in scientific appraisal. In this paper, I argue we should explicate fruitfulness as the capacity to develop of research programs. Moreover, I provide a novel strategy to assess and compare the fruitfulness of programs focused on their research questions and heuristics. To illustrate how this strategy would work, I will discuss a case study, namely the adaptationist program in evolutionary psychology.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Pages (from-to)4
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Research Program
Philosopher
Evolutionary Psychology
Heuristics

Keywords

  • ADAPTATIONISM
  • Adaptationism
  • Cognitive values
  • EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Fruitfulness
  • LOGIC
  • Methodological
  • QUESTIONS
  • SCIENCE
  • SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY

Cite this

@article{fec050e3d62b4ec29f743de696f71731,
title = "What we (should) talk about when we talk about fruitfulness",
abstract = "What are the relevant values to the appraisal of research programs? This question remains hotly debated, as philosophers have recently proposed many lists of values potentially relevant to scientific appraisal. Surprisingly, despite being mentioned in many lists, little attention has been paid to fruitfulness. It is unclear how fruitfulness should be explicated, and whether it has any substantial role in scientific appraisal. In this paper, I argue we should explicate fruitfulness as the capacity to develop of research programs. Moreover, I provide a novel strategy to assess and compare the fruitfulness of programs focused on their research questions and heuristics. To illustrate how this strategy would work, I will discuss a case study, namely the adaptationist program in evolutionary psychology.",
keywords = "ADAPTATIONISM, Adaptationism, Cognitive values, EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, Evolutionary psychology, Fruitfulness, LOGIC, Methodological, QUESTIONS, SCIENCE, SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY",
author = "Silvia Ivani",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13194-018-0231-7",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "4",
journal = "European Journal for Philosophy of Science",
issn = "1879-4912",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

What we (should) talk about when we talk about fruitfulness. / Ivani, Silvia.

In: European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, 4, 01.2019, p. 4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What we (should) talk about when we talk about fruitfulness

AU - Ivani, Silvia

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - What are the relevant values to the appraisal of research programs? This question remains hotly debated, as philosophers have recently proposed many lists of values potentially relevant to scientific appraisal. Surprisingly, despite being mentioned in many lists, little attention has been paid to fruitfulness. It is unclear how fruitfulness should be explicated, and whether it has any substantial role in scientific appraisal. In this paper, I argue we should explicate fruitfulness as the capacity to develop of research programs. Moreover, I provide a novel strategy to assess and compare the fruitfulness of programs focused on their research questions and heuristics. To illustrate how this strategy would work, I will discuss a case study, namely the adaptationist program in evolutionary psychology.

AB - What are the relevant values to the appraisal of research programs? This question remains hotly debated, as philosophers have recently proposed many lists of values potentially relevant to scientific appraisal. Surprisingly, despite being mentioned in many lists, little attention has been paid to fruitfulness. It is unclear how fruitfulness should be explicated, and whether it has any substantial role in scientific appraisal. In this paper, I argue we should explicate fruitfulness as the capacity to develop of research programs. Moreover, I provide a novel strategy to assess and compare the fruitfulness of programs focused on their research questions and heuristics. To illustrate how this strategy would work, I will discuss a case study, namely the adaptationist program in evolutionary psychology.

KW - ADAPTATIONISM

KW - Adaptationism

KW - Cognitive values

KW - EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Fruitfulness

KW - LOGIC

KW - Methodological

KW - QUESTIONS

KW - SCIENCE

KW - SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY

U2 - 10.1007/s13194-018-0231-7

DO - 10.1007/s13194-018-0231-7

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 4

JO - European Journal for Philosophy of Science

JF - European Journal for Philosophy of Science

SN - 1879-4912

IS - 1

M1 - 4

ER -