What's behind crashing memories?

Plausibility, belief and memory in reports of having seen non-existent images

Tom Smeets, Sebastian Telgen, James Ost, Marko Jelicic, Harald Merckelbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The present study investigated the precise nature of crashing memory reports: Are they truly memories or are they based on beliefs? We asked 88 individuals whether they had seen non‐existent footage of the Pim Fortuyn assassination and conducted thorough post‐experimental interviews. Two‐thirds of our participants falsely reported having seen the footage, while less than 10% also reported details that they could not have seen. Moreover, plausibility ratings of having seen the images were higher than false belief ratings, which in turn were higher than false memory ratings. After having been fully debriefed, 81% of the participants who reported crashing memories attributed their false report to their lack of a full understanding of the critical question. Another 10% of this subsample stated that they truly remembered the images (i.e. false memories). Thus, only a small subset of crashing memory reports seems to be induced by false beliefs and/or false memories.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1333-1341
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Plausibility
Rating
False Memory
Interviews
Footage
False Belief
Assassination

Cite this

Smeets, Tom ; Telgen, Sebastian ; Ost, James ; Jelicic, Marko ; Merckelbach, Harald. / What's behind crashing memories? Plausibility, belief and memory in reports of having seen non-existent images. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 9. pp. 1333-1341.
@article{8eb3fddbba5e42aeb3b5971ea6394798,
title = "What's behind crashing memories?: Plausibility, belief and memory in reports of having seen non-existent images",
abstract = "The present study investigated the precise nature of crashing memory reports: Are they truly memories or are they based on beliefs? We asked 88 individuals whether they had seen non‐existent footage of the Pim Fortuyn assassination and conducted thorough post‐experimental interviews. Two‐thirds of our participants falsely reported having seen the footage, while less than 10{\%} also reported details that they could not have seen. Moreover, plausibility ratings of having seen the images were higher than false belief ratings, which in turn were higher than false memory ratings. After having been fully debriefed, 81{\%} of the participants who reported crashing memories attributed their false report to their lack of a full understanding of the critical question. Another 10{\%} of this subsample stated that they truly remembered the images (i.e. false memories). Thus, only a small subset of crashing memory reports seems to be induced by false beliefs and/or false memories.",
author = "Tom Smeets and Sebastian Telgen and James Ost and Marko Jelicic and Harald Merckelbach",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1544",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1333--1341",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

What's behind crashing memories? Plausibility, belief and memory in reports of having seen non-existent images. / Smeets, Tom; Telgen, Sebastian; Ost, James; Jelicic, Marko; Merckelbach, Harald.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2009, p. 1333-1341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What's behind crashing memories?

T2 - Plausibility, belief and memory in reports of having seen non-existent images

AU - Smeets, Tom

AU - Telgen, Sebastian

AU - Ost, James

AU - Jelicic, Marko

AU - Merckelbach, Harald

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The present study investigated the precise nature of crashing memory reports: Are they truly memories or are they based on beliefs? We asked 88 individuals whether they had seen non‐existent footage of the Pim Fortuyn assassination and conducted thorough post‐experimental interviews. Two‐thirds of our participants falsely reported having seen the footage, while less than 10% also reported details that they could not have seen. Moreover, plausibility ratings of having seen the images were higher than false belief ratings, which in turn were higher than false memory ratings. After having been fully debriefed, 81% of the participants who reported crashing memories attributed their false report to their lack of a full understanding of the critical question. Another 10% of this subsample stated that they truly remembered the images (i.e. false memories). Thus, only a small subset of crashing memory reports seems to be induced by false beliefs and/or false memories.

AB - The present study investigated the precise nature of crashing memory reports: Are they truly memories or are they based on beliefs? We asked 88 individuals whether they had seen non‐existent footage of the Pim Fortuyn assassination and conducted thorough post‐experimental interviews. Two‐thirds of our participants falsely reported having seen the footage, while less than 10% also reported details that they could not have seen. Moreover, plausibility ratings of having seen the images were higher than false belief ratings, which in turn were higher than false memory ratings. After having been fully debriefed, 81% of the participants who reported crashing memories attributed their false report to their lack of a full understanding of the critical question. Another 10% of this subsample stated that they truly remembered the images (i.e. false memories). Thus, only a small subset of crashing memory reports seems to be induced by false beliefs and/or false memories.

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1544

DO - 10.1002/acp.1544

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1333

EP - 1341

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 9

ER -