When do arrows start to compete? A developmental mouse-tracking study

Frouke Hermens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Recent work in adults has suggested that the strength of social and symbolic cues not presented at fixation (but allowing eye movements to the cue) may be determined less by their biological relevance and more by the distinctiveness of the shape of the cue. The present study examines whether these results extend to children, who may differ in their relative exposure to symbolic cues (arrows) compared to social cues. Children aged 3 to 11 were presented with congruent or incongruent pairs of cues (line drawings of gazing eyes, pointing hands, and arrows) and were asked to indicate the direction of the target cue (indicated at the start of the block) by moving the mouse towards the response box indicating its direction. Results show a similar advantage for arrows and pointing hands in young children as previously found in adults, suggesting that cue shape trumps biological relevance for cues away from fixation from an early age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-188
Number of pages12
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume182
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Social attention
  • Mouse tracking
  • Symbolic cueing
  • VISUAL-ATTENTION
  • SYMBOLIC CUES
  • EYE GAZE
  • CURVATURE
  • INFANCY
  • AUTISM

Cite this

@article{7a496fb05f4d47f8990b040fc936961a,
title = "When do arrows start to compete? A developmental mouse-tracking study",
abstract = "Recent work in adults has suggested that the strength of social and symbolic cues not presented at fixation (but allowing eye movements to the cue) may be determined less by their biological relevance and more by the distinctiveness of the shape of the cue. The present study examines whether these results extend to children, who may differ in their relative exposure to symbolic cues (arrows) compared to social cues. Children aged 3 to 11 were presented with congruent or incongruent pairs of cues (line drawings of gazing eyes, pointing hands, and arrows) and were asked to indicate the direction of the target cue (indicated at the start of the block) by moving the mouse towards the response box indicating its direction. Results show a similar advantage for arrows and pointing hands in young children as previously found in adults, suggesting that cue shape trumps biological relevance for cues away from fixation from an early age.",
keywords = "Social attention, Mouse tracking, Symbolic cueing, VISUAL-ATTENTION, SYMBOLIC CUES, EYE GAZE, CURVATURE, INFANCY, AUTISM",
author = "Frouke Hermens",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.015",
language = "English",
volume = "182",
pages = "177--188",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",

}

When do arrows start to compete? A developmental mouse-tracking study. / Hermens, Frouke.

In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 182, 01.2018, p. 177-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When do arrows start to compete? A developmental mouse-tracking study

AU - Hermens, Frouke

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Recent work in adults has suggested that the strength of social and symbolic cues not presented at fixation (but allowing eye movements to the cue) may be determined less by their biological relevance and more by the distinctiveness of the shape of the cue. The present study examines whether these results extend to children, who may differ in their relative exposure to symbolic cues (arrows) compared to social cues. Children aged 3 to 11 were presented with congruent or incongruent pairs of cues (line drawings of gazing eyes, pointing hands, and arrows) and were asked to indicate the direction of the target cue (indicated at the start of the block) by moving the mouse towards the response box indicating its direction. Results show a similar advantage for arrows and pointing hands in young children as previously found in adults, suggesting that cue shape trumps biological relevance for cues away from fixation from an early age.

AB - Recent work in adults has suggested that the strength of social and symbolic cues not presented at fixation (but allowing eye movements to the cue) may be determined less by their biological relevance and more by the distinctiveness of the shape of the cue. The present study examines whether these results extend to children, who may differ in their relative exposure to symbolic cues (arrows) compared to social cues. Children aged 3 to 11 were presented with congruent or incongruent pairs of cues (line drawings of gazing eyes, pointing hands, and arrows) and were asked to indicate the direction of the target cue (indicated at the start of the block) by moving the mouse towards the response box indicating its direction. Results show a similar advantage for arrows and pointing hands in young children as previously found in adults, suggesting that cue shape trumps biological relevance for cues away from fixation from an early age.

KW - Social attention

KW - Mouse tracking

KW - Symbolic cueing

KW - VISUAL-ATTENTION

KW - SYMBOLIC CUES

KW - EYE GAZE

KW - CURVATURE

KW - INFANCY

KW - AUTISM

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.015

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.015

M3 - Article

VL - 182

SP - 177

EP - 188

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

ER -