When does self-reported prosocial motivation predict helping?

The moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation

A. Aydinli, Michael Bender, A. Chasiotis, Zeynep Cemalcilar, Fons J. R. van de Vijver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In three studies, we tested a motivational model to predict different types of helping from an interactionist, dual-system perspective. We argued that helping behavior is determined by the interplay of two distinct motivational systems: the explicit (i.e., conscious) and the implicit (i.e., unconscious). In line with previous research we expected that explicit prosocial motivation relates to helping, and additionally proposed that depending on the type of helping this relationship is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation: For planned helping, explicit prosocial motivation is a sufficient predictor, regardless of implicit prosocial motivation. For spontaneous helping, on the other hand, the effect of explicit prosocial motivation is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation, and only predictive when also implicit prosocial motivation is high. Study 1 (207 Dutch participants, M age = 51.7 years; 51.7 % female) with self-reported willingness to help as dependent variable confirmed that planned helping was determined by explicit prosocial motivation, whereas its effect on spontaneous helping was moderated by implicit prosocial motivation. Study 2 (193 U.S. participants, M age = 35.2 years; 64.2 % female) with real-life measures of planned help confirmed the hypothesized main effect of explicit prosocial motivation. Study 3 (73 Dutch participants, M age = 20.8 years; 68.5 % female) with a real-life measure of spontaneous helping confirmed the moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation, as the effect of explicit prosocial motivation on helping was only significant for individuals with high implicit prosocial motivation. We argue that considering implicit prosocial motivation provides an overlooked avenue for a more systematic investigation of helping.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-658
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Implicit motivation
  • Explicit motivation
  • Motive congruence
  • Prosocial
  • Helping
  • Volunteering

Cite this

@article{6dac994146d6420484e42f3a75785850,
title = "When does self-reported prosocial motivation predict helping?: The moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation",
abstract = "In three studies, we tested a motivational model to predict different types of helping from an interactionist, dual-system perspective. We argued that helping behavior is determined by the interplay of two distinct motivational systems: the explicit (i.e., conscious) and the implicit (i.e., unconscious). In line with previous research we expected that explicit prosocial motivation relates to helping, and additionally proposed that depending on the type of helping this relationship is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation: For planned helping, explicit prosocial motivation is a sufficient predictor, regardless of implicit prosocial motivation. For spontaneous helping, on the other hand, the effect of explicit prosocial motivation is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation, and only predictive when also implicit prosocial motivation is high. Study 1 (207 Dutch participants, M age = 51.7 years; 51.7 {\%} female) with self-reported willingness to help as dependent variable confirmed that planned helping was determined by explicit prosocial motivation, whereas its effect on spontaneous helping was moderated by implicit prosocial motivation. Study 2 (193 U.S. participants, M age = 35.2 years; 64.2 {\%} female) with real-life measures of planned help confirmed the hypothesized main effect of explicit prosocial motivation. Study 3 (73 Dutch participants, M age = 20.8 years; 68.5 {\%} female) with a real-life measure of spontaneous helping confirmed the moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation, as the effect of explicit prosocial motivation on helping was only significant for individuals with high implicit prosocial motivation. We argue that considering implicit prosocial motivation provides an overlooked avenue for a more systematic investigation of helping.",
keywords = "Implicit motivation, Explicit motivation, Motive congruence, Prosocial, Helping, Volunteering",
author = "A. Aydinli and Michael Bender and A. Chasiotis and Zeynep Cemalcilar and {van de Vijver}, {Fons J. R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-014-9411-8",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "645--658",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

When does self-reported prosocial motivation predict helping? The moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation. / Aydinli, A.; Bender, Michael; Chasiotis, A.; Cemalcilar, Zeynep; van de Vijver, Fons J. R.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 38, No. 5, 10.2014, p. 645-658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When does self-reported prosocial motivation predict helping?

T2 - The moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation

AU - Aydinli, A.

AU - Bender, Michael

AU - Chasiotis, A.

AU - Cemalcilar, Zeynep

AU - van de Vijver, Fons J. R.

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - In three studies, we tested a motivational model to predict different types of helping from an interactionist, dual-system perspective. We argued that helping behavior is determined by the interplay of two distinct motivational systems: the explicit (i.e., conscious) and the implicit (i.e., unconscious). In line with previous research we expected that explicit prosocial motivation relates to helping, and additionally proposed that depending on the type of helping this relationship is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation: For planned helping, explicit prosocial motivation is a sufficient predictor, regardless of implicit prosocial motivation. For spontaneous helping, on the other hand, the effect of explicit prosocial motivation is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation, and only predictive when also implicit prosocial motivation is high. Study 1 (207 Dutch participants, M age = 51.7 years; 51.7 % female) with self-reported willingness to help as dependent variable confirmed that planned helping was determined by explicit prosocial motivation, whereas its effect on spontaneous helping was moderated by implicit prosocial motivation. Study 2 (193 U.S. participants, M age = 35.2 years; 64.2 % female) with real-life measures of planned help confirmed the hypothesized main effect of explicit prosocial motivation. Study 3 (73 Dutch participants, M age = 20.8 years; 68.5 % female) with a real-life measure of spontaneous helping confirmed the moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation, as the effect of explicit prosocial motivation on helping was only significant for individuals with high implicit prosocial motivation. We argue that considering implicit prosocial motivation provides an overlooked avenue for a more systematic investigation of helping.

AB - In three studies, we tested a motivational model to predict different types of helping from an interactionist, dual-system perspective. We argued that helping behavior is determined by the interplay of two distinct motivational systems: the explicit (i.e., conscious) and the implicit (i.e., unconscious). In line with previous research we expected that explicit prosocial motivation relates to helping, and additionally proposed that depending on the type of helping this relationship is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation: For planned helping, explicit prosocial motivation is a sufficient predictor, regardless of implicit prosocial motivation. For spontaneous helping, on the other hand, the effect of explicit prosocial motivation is moderated by implicit prosocial motivation, and only predictive when also implicit prosocial motivation is high. Study 1 (207 Dutch participants, M age = 51.7 years; 51.7 % female) with self-reported willingness to help as dependent variable confirmed that planned helping was determined by explicit prosocial motivation, whereas its effect on spontaneous helping was moderated by implicit prosocial motivation. Study 2 (193 U.S. participants, M age = 35.2 years; 64.2 % female) with real-life measures of planned help confirmed the hypothesized main effect of explicit prosocial motivation. Study 3 (73 Dutch participants, M age = 20.8 years; 68.5 % female) with a real-life measure of spontaneous helping confirmed the moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation, as the effect of explicit prosocial motivation on helping was only significant for individuals with high implicit prosocial motivation. We argue that considering implicit prosocial motivation provides an overlooked avenue for a more systematic investigation of helping.

KW - Implicit motivation

KW - Explicit motivation

KW - Motive congruence

KW - Prosocial

KW - Helping

KW - Volunteering

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-014-9411-8

DO - 10.1007/s11031-014-9411-8

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 645

EP - 658

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 5

ER -