Who believes in the storybook image of the scientist?

C.L S Veldkamp, C.H.J. Hartgerink, M.A.L.M. van Assen, J.M. Wicherts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

128 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Do lay people and scientists themselves recognize that scientists are human and therefore prone to human fallibilities such as error, bias, and even dishonesty? In a series of three experimental studies and one correlational study (total N = 3,278) we found that the 'storybook image of the scientist' is pervasive: American lay people and scientists from over 60 countries attributed considerably more objectivity, rationality, open-mindedness, intelligence, integrity, and communality to scientists than other highly-educated people. Moreover, scientists perceived even larger differences than lay people did. Some groups of scientists also differentiated between different categories of scientists: established scientists attributed higher levels of the scientific traits to established scientists than to early-career scientists and PhD students, and higher levels to PhD students than to early-career scientists. Female scientists attributed considerably higher levels of the scientific traits to female scientists than to male scientists. A strong belief in the storybook image and the (human) tendency to attribute higher levels of desirable traits to people in one's own group than to people in other groups may decrease scientists' willingness to adopt recently proposed practices to reduce error, bias and dishonesty in science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-151
JournalAccountability in Research
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

female scientist
career
Group
objectivity
trend
rationality
integrity
intelligence
student
science

Cite this

Veldkamp, C.L S ; Hartgerink, C.H.J. ; van Assen, M.A.L.M. ; Wicherts, J.M. / Who believes in the storybook image of the scientist?. In: Accountability in Research. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 127-151.
@article{fb2130fd64d14ac89e725f1b50fbc162,
title = "Who believes in the storybook image of the scientist?",
abstract = "Do lay people and scientists themselves recognize that scientists are human and therefore prone to human fallibilities such as error, bias, and even dishonesty? In a series of three experimental studies and one correlational study (total N = 3,278) we found that the 'storybook image of the scientist' is pervasive: American lay people and scientists from over 60 countries attributed considerably more objectivity, rationality, open-mindedness, intelligence, integrity, and communality to scientists than other highly-educated people. Moreover, scientists perceived even larger differences than lay people did. Some groups of scientists also differentiated between different categories of scientists: established scientists attributed higher levels of the scientific traits to established scientists than to early-career scientists and PhD students, and higher levels to PhD students than to early-career scientists. Female scientists attributed considerably higher levels of the scientific traits to female scientists than to male scientists. A strong belief in the storybook image and the (human) tendency to attribute higher levels of desirable traits to people in one's own group than to people in other groups may decrease scientists' willingness to adopt recently proposed practices to reduce error, bias and dishonesty in science.",
author = "Veldkamp, {C.L S} and C.H.J. Hartgerink and {van Assen}, M.A.L.M. and J.M. Wicherts",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/08989621.2016.1268922",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "127--151",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "3",

}

Who believes in the storybook image of the scientist? / Veldkamp, C.L S; Hartgerink, C.H.J.; van Assen, M.A.L.M.; Wicherts, J.M.

In: Accountability in Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2017, p. 127-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who believes in the storybook image of the scientist?

AU - Veldkamp, C.L S

AU - Hartgerink, C.H.J.

AU - van Assen, M.A.L.M.

AU - Wicherts, J.M.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Do lay people and scientists themselves recognize that scientists are human and therefore prone to human fallibilities such as error, bias, and even dishonesty? In a series of three experimental studies and one correlational study (total N = 3,278) we found that the 'storybook image of the scientist' is pervasive: American lay people and scientists from over 60 countries attributed considerably more objectivity, rationality, open-mindedness, intelligence, integrity, and communality to scientists than other highly-educated people. Moreover, scientists perceived even larger differences than lay people did. Some groups of scientists also differentiated between different categories of scientists: established scientists attributed higher levels of the scientific traits to established scientists than to early-career scientists and PhD students, and higher levels to PhD students than to early-career scientists. Female scientists attributed considerably higher levels of the scientific traits to female scientists than to male scientists. A strong belief in the storybook image and the (human) tendency to attribute higher levels of desirable traits to people in one's own group than to people in other groups may decrease scientists' willingness to adopt recently proposed practices to reduce error, bias and dishonesty in science.

AB - Do lay people and scientists themselves recognize that scientists are human and therefore prone to human fallibilities such as error, bias, and even dishonesty? In a series of three experimental studies and one correlational study (total N = 3,278) we found that the 'storybook image of the scientist' is pervasive: American lay people and scientists from over 60 countries attributed considerably more objectivity, rationality, open-mindedness, intelligence, integrity, and communality to scientists than other highly-educated people. Moreover, scientists perceived even larger differences than lay people did. Some groups of scientists also differentiated between different categories of scientists: established scientists attributed higher levels of the scientific traits to established scientists than to early-career scientists and PhD students, and higher levels to PhD students than to early-career scientists. Female scientists attributed considerably higher levels of the scientific traits to female scientists than to male scientists. A strong belief in the storybook image and the (human) tendency to attribute higher levels of desirable traits to people in one's own group than to people in other groups may decrease scientists' willingness to adopt recently proposed practices to reduce error, bias and dishonesty in science.

U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2016.1268922

DO - 10.1080/08989621.2016.1268922

M3 - Article

C2 - 28001440

VL - 24

SP - 127

EP - 151

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

SN - 0898-9621

IS - 3

ER -