Abstract
Cultural practices and anecdotal accounts suggest that people expect suffering to lead to fortuitous rewards. To shed light on this illusory ‘suffering–reward’ association, we tested why and when this effect manifests. Across three vignette studies in which we manipulated the degree of suffering experienced by the protagonist, we tested a ‘just‐world maintenance’ explanation (suffering deserves to be compensated) and a ‘virtuous suffering’ explanation (suffering indicates virtues, which will be rewarded). Our findings revealed that the illusory ‘suffering–reward’ association (1) could serve as a way for people to cope with just‐world threats posed by the suffering of innocent victims, and (2) manifested when the suffering was not caused by the victim's own behaviour and not readily attributable to bad luck. Taken together, these findings not only provide evidence for the existence of the illusory ‘suffering–reward’ association but also elucidate its psychological underpinnings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 548-569 |
Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- BELIEF
- COMPETENCE
- GUILT
- JUSTICE
- KARMA
- MODEL
- SELF-PUNISHMENT
- fairness
- justice
- magical thinking
- suffering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why and when suffering increases the perceived likelihood of fortuitous rewards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Why and when suffering increases the perceived likelihood of fortuitous rewards
Ong, H. H. (Contributor), Nelissen, R. (Contributor) & van Beest, I. (Contributor), OSF, 2020
Dataset
-
Replication Data for: Why and when suffering increases the perceived likelihood of fortuitous rewards
Ong, H. H. (Creator), Nelissen, R. (Creator) & Van Beest, I. (Creator), DataverseNL, 30 Jul 2020
DOI: 10.34894/xq7pcy, https://dataverse.nl/citation?persistentId=doi:10.34894/XQ7PCY
Dataset