Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation

E.H. Bulte, D. Rondeau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-19
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume69
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Cite this

Bulte, E.H. ; Rondeau, D. / Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation. In: Journal of Wildlife Management. 2005 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 14-19.
@article{6de8a1e025a649a99d061b23adae5e86,
title = "Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation",
author = "E.H. Bulte and D. Rondeau",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "14--19",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Bulte, EH & Rondeau, D 2005, 'Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation', Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 14-19.

Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation. / Bulte, E.H.; Rondeau, D.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2005, p. 14-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation

AU - Bulte, E.H.

AU - Rondeau, D.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 14

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 1

ER -