Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

217 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Economic research overwhelmingly shows that the utility individuals derive from their income depends on the incomes of others. Theoretical literature has proven that these status effects imply a more egalitarian income policy than in the conventional case, in which people value their income independently from the income of others. This article qualifies this conclusion in three ways. First, this policy implication holds if low income groups are sensitive to status, but not if high income groups are predominantly so. Neither do status effects provide an economic rational for egalitarian income policy if they only pertain to peer groups with similar income levels. Third, if status effects are grounded in vices like envy, jealousy, grudgingness or spite, a moral basis for egalitarian income policy is lacking, because distributive justice cannot be based on perverse preferences.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherMacroeconomics
Number of pages19
Volume2010-73
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2010-73

Fingerprint

incomes policy
income
jealousy
envy
distributive justice
economic research
peer group
low income
Group

Keywords

  • relative income
  • positional goods
  • optimal taxation
  • egalitarian income policy
  • redistribution
  • status effects
  • envy

Cite this

Graafland, J. J. (2010). Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2010-73). Tilburg: Macroeconomics.
Graafland, J.J. / Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy. Tilburg : Macroeconomics, 2010. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{80b519707e15499e9b3985b24be7b888,
title = "Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy",
abstract = "Economic research overwhelmingly shows that the utility individuals derive from their income depends on the incomes of others. Theoretical literature has proven that these status effects imply a more egalitarian income policy than in the conventional case, in which people value their income independently from the income of others. This article qualifies this conclusion in three ways. First, this policy implication holds if low income groups are sensitive to status, but not if high income groups are predominantly so. Neither do status effects provide an economic rational for egalitarian income policy if they only pertain to peer groups with similar income levels. Third, if status effects are grounded in vices like envy, jealousy, grudgingness or spite, a moral basis for egalitarian income policy is lacking, because distributive justice cannot be based on perverse preferences.",
keywords = "relative income, positional goods, optimal taxation, egalitarian income policy, redistribution, status effects, envy",
author = "J.J. Graafland",
note = "Pagination: 19",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "2010-73",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Macroeconomics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Macroeconomics",

}

Graafland, JJ 2010 'Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2010-73, Macroeconomics, Tilburg.

Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy. / Graafland, J.J.

Tilburg : Macroeconomics, 2010. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2010-73).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy

AU - Graafland, J.J.

N1 - Pagination: 19

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Economic research overwhelmingly shows that the utility individuals derive from their income depends on the incomes of others. Theoretical literature has proven that these status effects imply a more egalitarian income policy than in the conventional case, in which people value their income independently from the income of others. This article qualifies this conclusion in three ways. First, this policy implication holds if low income groups are sensitive to status, but not if high income groups are predominantly so. Neither do status effects provide an economic rational for egalitarian income policy if they only pertain to peer groups with similar income levels. Third, if status effects are grounded in vices like envy, jealousy, grudgingness or spite, a moral basis for egalitarian income policy is lacking, because distributive justice cannot be based on perverse preferences.

AB - Economic research overwhelmingly shows that the utility individuals derive from their income depends on the incomes of others. Theoretical literature has proven that these status effects imply a more egalitarian income policy than in the conventional case, in which people value their income independently from the income of others. This article qualifies this conclusion in three ways. First, this policy implication holds if low income groups are sensitive to status, but not if high income groups are predominantly so. Neither do status effects provide an economic rational for egalitarian income policy if they only pertain to peer groups with similar income levels. Third, if status effects are grounded in vices like envy, jealousy, grudgingness or spite, a moral basis for egalitarian income policy is lacking, because distributive justice cannot be based on perverse preferences.

KW - relative income

KW - positional goods

KW - optimal taxation

KW - egalitarian income policy

KW - redistribution

KW - status effects

KW - envy

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2010-73

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy

PB - Macroeconomics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Graafland JJ. Why Status Effects Need not Justify Egalitarian Income Policy. Tilburg: Macroeconomics. 2010. (CentER Discussion Paper).