Why the Item “23 +1” Is Not in a Depression Questionnaire: Validity From a Network Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorScientific

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-54
JournalMeasurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
Volume10
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{b04df27a758043e88d2225d064bed7ce,
title = "Why the Item “23 +1” Is Not in a Depression Questionnaire: Validity From a Network Perspective",
author = "Cramer, {Ang{\'e}lique O. J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15366367.2012.681973",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "50--54",
journal = "Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives",
issn = "1536-6367",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-2",

}

Why the Item “23 +1” Is Not in a Depression Questionnaire: Validity From a Network Perspective. / Cramer, Angélique O. J.

In: Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, Vol. 10, No. 1-2, 01.01.2012, p. 50-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorScientific

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the Item “23 +1” Is Not in a Depression Questionnaire: Validity From a Network Perspective

AU - Cramer, Angélique O. J.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

U2 - 10.1080/15366367.2012.681973

DO - 10.1080/15366367.2012.681973

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

VL - 10

SP - 50

EP - 54

JO - Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives

JF - Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives

SN - 1536-6367

IS - 1-2

ER -