Why the sociological turn of the study of literature is not innovative in itself

H. Verdaasdonk

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)57-62
    Number of pages6
    JournalCanadian Review of Comparative Literature
    Volume24
    Publication statusPublished - 1997

    Cite this

    @article{155e6f97f4b54bd3b586699f330ac0d7,
    title = "Why the sociological turn of the study of literature is not innovative in itself",
    author = "H. Verdaasdonk",
    note = "Pagination: 6",
    year = "1997",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "57--62",
    journal = "Canadian Review of Comparative Literature",
    issn = "0319-051X",
    publisher = "Academic Printing and Publishing",

    }

    Why the sociological turn of the study of literature is not innovative in itself. / Verdaasdonk, H.

    In: Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, Vol. 24, 1997, p. 57-62.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why the sociological turn of the study of literature is not innovative in itself

    AU - Verdaasdonk, H.

    N1 - Pagination: 6

    PY - 1997

    Y1 - 1997

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 57

    EP - 62

    JO - Canadian Review of Comparative Literature

    JF - Canadian Review of Comparative Literature

    SN - 0319-051X

    ER -