Willingness to pay for green electricity

A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error

L.A.G. Oerlemans, Kai-Ying Chan, Jako Volschenk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Contingent valuation is widely used due to its flexibility in valuing a wide variety of non-market goods. Although this method has important benefits, its validity and reliability are often criticised. This paper reviews the literature on the use of contingent valuation for measuring willingness to pay (WTP) for electricity generated from renewable energy sources (green electricity). A literature review, conducted on a sample of 51 peer-reviewed studies, shows that the vast majority of contingent evaluation studies stems from developed economies. Furthermore, most frequently used WTP elicitation techniques are open-ended and dichotomous choice approaches, which tend to produce varying levels of WTP. Studies dealing with the antecedents of WTP are predominantly inspired by the theory of reasoned action or by its extension, the theory of planned behaviour. This paper identifies five common errors in contingent valuation methods and discusses a number of remedies to deal with these errors in WTP research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)875–885
JournalRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume66
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Electricity

Keywords

  • Contingent valuation method; willingness to pay; green electricity; elicitation techniques

Cite this

@article{02564641eb1348bdb1e16638c75d7f80,
title = "Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error",
abstract = "Contingent valuation is widely used due to its flexibility in valuing a wide variety of non-market goods. Although this method has important benefits, its validity and reliability are often criticised. This paper reviews the literature on the use of contingent valuation for measuring willingness to pay (WTP) for electricity generated from renewable energy sources (green electricity). A literature review, conducted on a sample of 51 peer-reviewed studies, shows that the vast majority of contingent evaluation studies stems from developed economies. Furthermore, most frequently used WTP elicitation techniques are open-ended and dichotomous choice approaches, which tend to produce varying levels of WTP. Studies dealing with the antecedents of WTP are predominantly inspired by the theory of reasoned action or by its extension, the theory of planned behaviour. This paper identifies five common errors in contingent valuation methods and discusses a number of remedies to deal with these errors in WTP research.",
keywords = "Contingent valuation method; willingness to pay; green electricity; elicitation techniques",
author = "L.A.G. Oerlemans and Kai-Ying Chan and Jako Volschenk",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.054",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "875–885",
journal = "Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Willingness to pay for green electricity : A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error. / Oerlemans, L.A.G.; Chan, Kai-Ying; Volschenk, Jako.

In: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 66, 2016, p. 875–885.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Willingness to pay for green electricity

T2 - A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error

AU - Oerlemans, L.A.G.

AU - Chan, Kai-Ying

AU - Volschenk, Jako

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Contingent valuation is widely used due to its flexibility in valuing a wide variety of non-market goods. Although this method has important benefits, its validity and reliability are often criticised. This paper reviews the literature on the use of contingent valuation for measuring willingness to pay (WTP) for electricity generated from renewable energy sources (green electricity). A literature review, conducted on a sample of 51 peer-reviewed studies, shows that the vast majority of contingent evaluation studies stems from developed economies. Furthermore, most frequently used WTP elicitation techniques are open-ended and dichotomous choice approaches, which tend to produce varying levels of WTP. Studies dealing with the antecedents of WTP are predominantly inspired by the theory of reasoned action or by its extension, the theory of planned behaviour. This paper identifies five common errors in contingent valuation methods and discusses a number of remedies to deal with these errors in WTP research.

AB - Contingent valuation is widely used due to its flexibility in valuing a wide variety of non-market goods. Although this method has important benefits, its validity and reliability are often criticised. This paper reviews the literature on the use of contingent valuation for measuring willingness to pay (WTP) for electricity generated from renewable energy sources (green electricity). A literature review, conducted on a sample of 51 peer-reviewed studies, shows that the vast majority of contingent evaluation studies stems from developed economies. Furthermore, most frequently used WTP elicitation techniques are open-ended and dichotomous choice approaches, which tend to produce varying levels of WTP. Studies dealing with the antecedents of WTP are predominantly inspired by the theory of reasoned action or by its extension, the theory of planned behaviour. This paper identifies five common errors in contingent valuation methods and discusses a number of remedies to deal with these errors in WTP research.

KW - Contingent valuation method; willingness to pay; green electricity; elicitation techniques

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.054

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.054

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 875

EP - 885

JO - Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -