Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders: Testing hierometer and sociometer theories of self-regard

N. Mahadevan, A. Gregg, C. Sedikides, W.G. de Waal-Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.
Original languageEnglish
Article number334
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Narcissism
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression

Cite this

Mahadevan, N. ; Gregg, A. ; Sedikides, C. ; de Waal-Andrews, W.G. / Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders : Testing hierometer and sociometer theories of self-regard. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 7.
@article{532f41a73c194053afd0db51a4732b4f,
title = "Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders: Testing hierometer and sociometer theories of self-regard",
abstract = "What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.",
author = "N. Mahadevan and A. Gregg and C. Sedikides and {de Waal-Andrews}, W.G.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00334",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders : Testing hierometer and sociometer theories of self-regard. / Mahadevan, N.; Gregg, A.; Sedikides, C.; de Waal-Andrews, W.G.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, 334, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders

T2 - Testing hierometer and sociometer theories of self-regard

AU - Mahadevan, N.

AU - Gregg, A.

AU - Sedikides, C.

AU - de Waal-Andrews, W.G.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.

AB - What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00334

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00334

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 334

ER -